Polman C H, Reingold S C, Barkhof F, Calabresi P A, Clanet M, Cohen J A, Cutter G R, Freedman M S, Kappos L, Lublin F D, McFarland H F, Metz L M, Miller A E, Montalban X, O'Connor P W, Panitch H, Richert J R, Petkau J, Schwid S R, Sormani M P, Thompson A J, Weinshenker B G, Wolinsky J S
Department of Neurology, Free University Medical Center in Amsterdam, PO Box 4075, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neurology. 2008 Mar 25;70(13 Pt 2):1134-40. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000306410.84794.4d.
The increasing number of established effective therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and emerging consensus for early treatment raise practical concerns and ethical dilemmas for placebo-controlled clinical trials in this disease. An international group of clinicians, ethicists, statisticians, regulators, and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry convened to reconsider prior recommendations regarding the ethics of placebo-controlled trials in MS. The group concluded that placebo-controlled trials can still be done ethically, with restrictions. For patients with relapsing MS for which established effective therapies exist, placebo-controlled trials should only be offered with rigorous informed consent if the subjects refuse to use these treatments, have not responded to them, or if these treatments are not available to them for other reasons (e.g., economics). Suggestions are provided to protect subject autonomy and improve informed consent procedures. Recommendations are tighter than previously suggested for placebo-controlled trials in "resource-restricted" environments where established therapies may not be available. Guidance is also provided on the ethics of alternative trial designs and the balance between study subject burden and risk, scientific rationale and interpretability of trial outcomes.
复发型多发性硬化症(MS)已确立的有效治疗方法数量不断增加,且早期治疗的共识日益形成,这引发了针对该疾病安慰剂对照临床试验的实际问题和伦理困境。一组来自国际的临床医生、伦理学家、统计学家、监管机构人员以及制药行业代表齐聚一堂,重新审视先前关于MS安慰剂对照试验伦理的建议。该小组得出结论,安慰剂对照试验在有一定限制的情况下仍可在伦理上进行。对于已有确立的有效治疗方法的复发型MS患者,如果受试者拒绝使用这些治疗、对其无反应或因其他原因(如经济因素)无法获得这些治疗,则只有在获得严格知情同意的情况下才能提供安慰剂对照试验。文中还提供了保护受试者自主权和改进知情同意程序的建议。对于在“资源受限”环境中进行的安慰剂对照试验,即可能无法获得已确立治疗方法的情况,建议比以前更为严格。文中还就替代试验设计的伦理以及研究受试者负担与风险、科学依据和试验结果的可解释性之间的平衡提供了指导。