Pierre-Jacques Marsha, Safran Dana Gelb, Zhang Fang, Ross-Degnan Dennis, Adams Alyce S, Gurwitz Jerry, Rusinak Donna, Soumerai Stephen B
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):444-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815dc59a.
Although several national studies have attempted to measure medication nonadherence due to cost in cross-sectional studies of the elderly and disabled, little information exists on the psychometric properties of these measures over time.
Examine the test-retest reliability of several recently published measures of cost-related medication nonadherence, among elderly community.
We developed a questionnaire and tested the reliability of measures of cost-related medication nonadherence and general cost-reduction strategies in a sample of 185 elderly in eastern Massachusetts surveyed twice (1-2 months apart). General and medicine-specific cost-related nonadherence measures included: failure to fill or delayed refilling of a prescription due to its cost, skipping doses, or taking smaller doses to make a medicine last longer. We also tested the reliability of reported drug cost-reduction strategies, such as: using generic drugs; purchasing prescriptions via mail/internet or from outside the United States; receiving prescription samples from a doctor; and spending less on food, heat, or other basic needs to afford medicines. We used the McNemar test, a matched pair chi analysis, and Kappa statistics to examine the association of responses within patients between identical items asked at 2 points in time.
Kappa statistics for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.6 to 0.9 for all but one measure of cost-related nonadherence, and McNemar test statistics indicated no systematic change in the measures over time.
The estimated test-retest reliability of the measures of cost-related medication nonadherence were generally high. The measures have been integrated into the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), an ongoing national panel survey of Medicare beneficiaries, which will allow researchers and policymakers to identify changes in cost-related nonadherence among disabled and elderly Medicare beneficiaries.
尽管多项全国性研究试图在针对老年人和残疾人的横断面研究中衡量因费用导致的用药不依从情况,但关于这些衡量指标随时间推移的心理测量特性的信息却很少。
检验几种最近发表的与费用相关的用药不依从衡量指标在老年社区人群中的重测信度。
我们编制了一份问卷,并在马萨诸塞州东部的185名老年人样本中测试了与费用相关的用药不依从衡量指标及一般费用降低策略的信度,这些老年人接受了两次调查(间隔1 - 2个月)。与费用相关的一般和特定药物不依从衡量指标包括:因费用原因未取药或延迟取药、漏服剂量或减少剂量以使药物服用时间更长。我们还测试了所报告的药物费用降低策略的信度,例如:使用通用药物;通过邮件/互联网或从美国境外购买处方药物;从医生处获得处方样本;以及为了买药而在食品、取暖或其他基本需求上减少开支。我们使用McNemar检验、配对卡方分析和Kappa统计量来检验患者在两个时间点对相同项目的回答之间的关联。
除一项与费用相关的不依从衡量指标外,所有指标的重测信度Kappa统计量范围为0.6至0.9,McNemar检验统计量表明这些指标随时间没有系统性变化。
与费用相关的用药不依从衡量指标的估计重测信度普遍较高。这些指标已被纳入具有全国代表性的医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS),这是一项正在进行的针对医疗保险受益人的全国性面板调查,这将使研究人员和政策制定者能够确定残疾和老年医疗保险受益人中与费用相关的不依从情况的变化。