Alhassan Sofiya, Sirard John R, Spencer Tirzah R, Varady Ann, Robinson Thomas N
Dept of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherts, MA 01003-0258, USA.
J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1:S112-25. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s112.
The purpose of this study was to develop a data-driven approach for analyzing incomplete accelerometer data from field-base studies.
Multiple days of accelerometer data from the Stanford Girls health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (N = 294 African American girls) were summed across each minute of each day to produce a composite weekday and weekend day. Composite method estimates of physical activity were compared with those derived from methods typically described in the literature (comparison methods).
The composite method retained 99.7% and 100% of participants in weekday and weekend-day analysis, respectively, versus 84.7% to 94.2% and 28.6% to 99.0% for the comparison methods. Average wearing times for the composite method for weekday and weekend day were 99.6% and 98.6%, respectively, 91.7% to 93.9% and 82.3% to 95.4% for the comparison methods. Composite-method physical activity estimates were similar to comparison-methods estimates.
The composite method used more available accelerometer data than standard approaches, reducing the need to exclude periods within a day, entire days, and participants from analysis.
本研究的目的是开发一种数据驱动的方法,用于分析来自现场研究的不完整加速度计数据。
对斯坦福女孩健康促进多地点研究(N = 294名非裔美国女孩)中多天的加速度计数据按每天的每分钟进行汇总,以生成工作日和周末的综合数据。将综合方法得出的身体活动估计值与文献中通常描述的方法(比较方法)得出的估计值进行比较。
在工作日和周末分析中,综合方法分别保留了99.7%和100%的参与者,而比较方法的保留率为84.7%至94.2%和28.6%至99.0%。综合方法在工作日和周末的平均佩戴时间分别为99.6%和98.6%,比较方法的平均佩戴时间为91.7%至93.9%和82.3%至95.4%。综合方法得出的身体活动估计值与比较方法得出的估计值相似。
与标准方法相比,综合方法使用了更多可用的加速度计数据,减少了在分析中排除一天内的时间段、整天以及参与者的需求。