Suppr超能文献

成人中根据体重指数(BMI)确定的每日计步器步数的切点。

BMI-referenced cut points for pedometer-determined steps per day in adults.

作者信息

Tudor-Locke C, Bassett D R, Rutherford W J, Ainsworth B E, Chan C B, Croteau K, Giles-Corti B, Le Masurier G, Moreau K, Mrozek J, Oppert J M, Raustorp A, Strath S J, Thompson D, Whitt-Glover M C, Wilde B, Wojcik J R

机构信息

Dept of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S126-39. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s126.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to establish preliminary criterion-referenced cut points for adult pedometer-determined physical activity (PA) related to weight status defined by body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

Researchers contributed directly measured BMI and pedometer data that had been collected (1) using a Yamax-manufactured pedometer, (2) for a minimum of 3 days, (3) on ostensibly healthy adults. The contrasting groups method was used to identify age- and gender-specific cut points for steps/d related to BMI cut points for normal weight and overweight/obesity (defined as BMI <25 and >or=25 kg/m2, respectively).

RESULTS

Data included 3127 individuals age 18 to 94 years (976 men, age = 46.8 +/- 15.4 years, BMI = 27.3 +/- 4.9; 2151 women, age = 47.4 +/- 14.9 years, BMI = 27.6 +/- 6.4; all gender differences NS). Best estimated cut points for normal versus overweight/obesity ranged from 11,000 to 12,000 steps/d for men and 8000 to 12,000 steps/d for women (consistently higher for younger age groups).

CONCLUSIONS

These steps/d cut points can be used to identify individuals at risk, or the proportion of adults achieving or falling short of set cut points can be reported and compared between populations. Cut points can also be used to set intervention goals, and they can be referred to when evaluating program impact, as well as environmental and policy changes.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是为通过计步器测定的、与体重指数(BMI)所定义的体重状况相关的成人身体活动(PA)建立初步的标准参照切点。

方法

研究人员提供了直接测量的BMI和计步器数据,这些数据是(1)使用Yamax生产的计步器收集的,(2)至少收集3天,(3)来自表面健康的成年人。采用对比组方法来确定与正常体重和超重/肥胖的BMI切点(分别定义为BMI<25和≥25kg/m²)相关的每日步数的年龄和性别特异性切点。

结果

数据包括3127名年龄在18至94岁之间的个体(976名男性,年龄=46.8±15.4岁,BMI=27.3±4.9;2151名女性,年龄=47.4±14.9岁,BMI=27.6±6.4;所有性别差异均无统计学意义)。正常与超重/肥胖的最佳估计切点男性为每日11,000至12,000步,女性为每日8000至12,000步(较年轻年龄组始终更高)。

结论

这些每日步数切点可用于识别有风险的个体,或者可以报告达到或未达到设定切点的成年人比例,并在不同人群之间进行比较。切点还可用于设定干预目标,在评估项目影响以及环境和政策变化时也可作为参考。

相似文献

1
BMI-referenced cut points for pedometer-determined steps per day in adults.
J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S126-39. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s126.
2
BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children.
Prev Med. 2004 Jun;38(6):857-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.018.
3
BMI-referenced cut-points for recommended daily pedometer-determined steps in Australian children and adolescents.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Jun;82(2):162-7. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599743.
4
Are current body mass index referenced pedometer step-count recommendations applicable to US youth?
J Phys Act Health. 2008 Sep;5(5):665-74. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.5.665.
5
The relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity and body composition variables.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Nov;25(11):1571-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801783.
6
Evaluation of the Omron HJ-720ITC pedometer under free-living conditions.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Sep;43(9):1791-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318212888c.
8
Pedometer step guidelines in relation to weight status among 5- to 16-year-old Australians.
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010 May;22(2):288-300. doi: 10.1123/pes.22.2.288.
10
Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):2045-51. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00027.

引用本文的文献

3
Objectively determined physical activity and adiposity measures in adult women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 23;13:935892. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.935892. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Apr 14;19:E18. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210343.
5
Evaluating Pedometer Algorithms on Semi-Regular and Unstructured Gaits.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;21(13):4260. doi: 10.3390/s21134260.
6
A 20-Year Follow-Up Study of Objectively Measured Physical Activity.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;18(6):3076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063076.
8

本文引用的文献

1
Pedometer indices for weekly physical activity recommendations in postmenopausal women.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Sep;37(9):1627-32. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000177455.58960.aa.
2
How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults?
Prev Med. 2005 Mar;40(3):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.003.
3
BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children.
Prev Med. 2004 Jun;38(6):857-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.018.
4
Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: construct validity.
Sports Med. 2004;34(5):281-91. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434050-00001.
5
Accumulating 10,000 steps: does this meet current physical activity guidelines?
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003 Dec;74(4):389-94. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609109.
6
How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.
Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001.
8
Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1455-60. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078932.61440.A2.
9
Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here?
Science. 2003 Feb 7;299(5608):853-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1079857.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验