Chen Jack P
Department of Cardiology, Northside Hospital and Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
South Med J. 2008 Feb;101(2):174-8. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000286752.67205.e0.
Like the introduction of bare metal stents (BMS), that of drug-eluting stents (DES) represented a quantum leap in the interventional cardiology community's ongoing efforts to conquer restenosis. However, recent concerns over late thrombosis (LT) have tempered the initial enthusiasm. Nonetheless, when compared with BMS, the slightly higher DES-LT is counterbalanced by the device's markedly lower incidence of restenosis, resulting in net equivalent rates of death, myocardial infarction, and overall major adverse cardiovascular events. This article summarizes for the noncardiology practitioner the benefits and risks of DES, as well as essentials of postprocedural care of the DES patient. We discuss the pathophysiology of stent thrombosis, pivotal DES trials, and adjunct antiplatelet pharmacology. In December 2006, the Food and Drug Administration convened an expert panel to review these devices. Their recommendations, as well as the joint statement from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, are outlined.
与裸金属支架(BMS)的引入一样,药物洗脱支架(DES)的问世代表着介入心脏病学界在攻克再狭窄方面不断努力过程中的一次巨大飞跃。然而,近期对晚期血栓形成(LT)的担忧削弱了最初的热情。尽管如此,与BMS相比,DES-LT略高的情况被该装置显著较低的再狭窄发生率所抵消,从而导致死亡、心肌梗死和总体主要不良心血管事件的净发生率相当。本文为非心脏病科医生总结了DES的益处和风险,以及DES患者术后护理的要点。我们讨论了支架血栓形成的病理生理学、关键的DES试验以及辅助抗血小板药理学。2006年12月,美国食品药品监督管理局召集了一个专家小组来审查这些装置。文中概述了他们的建议以及美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会的联合声明。