Brooks L R, Norman G R, Allen S W
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Sep;120(3):278-87. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.120.3.278.
Three experiments are reported showing that diagnosis of skin disorders by medical residents and general practitioners was facilitated by similar cases previously seen in the same context. Diagnosis of similar cases was facilitated more than that of dissimilar cases in the same diagnostic category, demonstrating that facilitation was not solely due to activation of the diagnostic category as a whole. Because diagnosis was posed in a multiple-choice format that always included the correct diagnosis, the relative disadvantage of dissimilar items was not due to the unavailability of the category name. The similarity effect also occurred with 2-week delay between the initial case and the test cases. Variations in diagnostic procedure, ranging from giving a quick first impression to arguing for given alternative diagnoses before selection, did not interact with the effect of similarity. This result suggests that the similarity effect is not strongly dependent on a particular diagnostic strategy.
报告了三项实验,结果表明,医学住院医师和全科医生对皮肤疾病的诊断因之前在相同情境下见过的类似病例而变得更容易。与同一诊断类别中的不同病例相比,类似病例的诊断更容易,这表明这种促进作用并非仅仅归因于整个诊断类别的激活。由于诊断采用多项选择题的形式,且总是包含正确诊断,所以不同项目的相对劣势并非由于类别名称不可用。在初始病例和测试病例之间延迟两周时,相似性效应依然出现。诊断程序的变化,从给出快速的第一印象到在选择前为给定的替代诊断进行论证,均未与相似性效应产生相互作用。这一结果表明,相似性效应并不强烈依赖于特定的诊断策略。