Suppr超能文献

机动车碰撞中因安全气囊使用不当导致的颈椎损伤。

Cervical spine injuries associated with the incorrect use of airbags in motor vehicle collisions.

作者信息

Donaldson William F, Hanks Stephen E, Nassr Ahmad, Vogt Molly T, Lee Joon Y

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 15;33(6):631-4. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318166e06d.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review and analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of cervical spine injuries with correct and incorrect use of front driver and passenger-side airbags. Summary of Background Data. Although there are abundant literature showing reduced injury severity and fatalities from seatbelts and airbags, no recent studies have delineated the affect of incorrect use of airbags in cervical spine injuries.

METHODS

The database from the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation was searched for drivers and front-seat passenger injuries from 1990 to 2002. The resulting records were then grouped into those using both seatbelt and the airbag, airbag-only, seatbelt-only, and no restraints. The data were then analyzed for frequency of cervical spine fractures with or without spinal cord injury and injury severity indexes.

RESULTS

The drivers using the airbag-only had significantly higher rate (54.1%) of cervical fractures than those using both airbag and a seatbelt (42.1%). Overall, drivers using the airbag-alone were 1.7 times more likely to suffer a cervical spine fracture than those using both protective devices. Likewise, passengers using the airbag-alone were 6.7 times more likely to suffer from a cervical spine fracture with spinal cord injury than those using both protective devices. In addition, the injury severity indexes (Glasgow coma scale, Injury Severity Score, Intensive Care Unit stays, and Total Hospital days) were significantly worse in patients who used an airbag-only.

CONCLUSION

Airbag use without the concomitant use of a seatbelt is associated with a higher incidence of cervical spine fractures with or without spinal cord injuries. Airbag misuse is also associated with higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow coma scale, and longer intensive care unit and total hospital stays, indicating that these patients suffer worse injury than those who use the airbag properly.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性数据库审查与分析。

目的

本研究旨在确定前排驾驶员和乘客侧安全气囊正确使用与错误使用情况下颈椎损伤的发生率。背景数据总结。尽管有大量文献表明安全带和安全气囊可降低损伤严重程度和死亡率,但近期尚无研究阐明安全气囊使用不当对颈椎损伤的影响。

方法

检索宾夕法尼亚创伤系统基金会1990年至2002年的数据库,查找驾驶员和前排乘客受伤情况。然后将所得记录分为同时使用安全带和安全气囊、仅使用安全气囊、仅使用安全带以及未使用任何约束装置的几组。接着分析有无脊髓损伤的颈椎骨折发生频率及损伤严重程度指数。

结果

仅使用安全气囊的驾驶员颈椎骨折发生率(54.1%)显著高于同时使用安全气囊和安全带的驾驶员(42.1%)。总体而言,仅使用安全气囊的驾驶员发生颈椎骨折的可能性是同时使用两种保护装置驾驶员的1.7倍。同样,仅使用安全气囊的乘客发生伴有脊髓损伤的颈椎骨折的可能性是同时使用两种保护装置乘客的6.7倍。此外,仅使用安全气囊的患者损伤严重程度指数(格拉斯哥昏迷量表、损伤严重程度评分、重症监护病房住院时间和总住院天数)明显更差。

结论

不配合使用安全带而单独使用安全气囊与有无脊髓损伤的颈椎骨折发生率较高相关。安全气囊使用不当还与更高的损伤严重程度评分、更低的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分以及更长的重症监护病房住院时间和总住院天数相关,这表明这些患者的损伤比正确使用安全气囊的患者更严重。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验