Bernabe-Ortiz Antonio, Curioso Walter H, Gonzales Marco A, Evangelista Wilfredo, Castagnetto Jesus M, Carcamo Cesar P, Hughes James P, Garcia Patricia J, Garnett Geoffrey P, Holmes King K
School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Mar 19;8:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-11.
Low-cost handheld computers (PDA) potentially represent an efficient tool for collecting sensitive data in surveys. The goal of this study is to evaluate the quality of sexual behavior data collected with handheld computers in comparison with paper-based questionnaires.
A PDA-based program for data collection was developed using Open-Source tools. In two cross-sectional studies, we compared data concerning sexual behavior collected with paper forms to data collected with PDA-based forms in Ancon (Lima).
The first study enrolled 200 participants (18-29 years). General agreement between data collected with paper format and handheld computers was 86%. Categorical variables agreement was between 70.5% and 98.5% (Kappa: 0.43-0.86) while numeric variables agreement was between 57.1% and 79.8% (Spearman: 0.76-0.95). Agreement and correlation were higher in those who had completed at least high school than those with less education. The second study enrolled 198 participants. Rates of responses to sensitive questions were similar between both kinds of questionnaires. However, the number of inconsistencies (p = 0.0001) and missing values (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in paper questionnaires.
This study showed the value of the use of handheld computers for collecting sensitive data, since a high level of agreement between paper and PDA responses was reached. In addition, a lower number of inconsistencies and missing values were found with the PDA-based system. This study has demonstrated that it is feasible to develop a low-cost application for handheld computers, and that PDAs are feasible alternatives for collecting field data in a developing country.
低成本手持电脑(个人数字助理)可能是调查中收集敏感数据的有效工具。本研究的目的是评估与纸质问卷相比,使用手持电脑收集的性行为数据的质量。
使用开源工具开发了一个基于个人数字助理的数据收集程序。在两项横断面研究中,我们将在安孔(利马)用纸质表格收集的性行为数据与用基于个人数字助理的表格收集的数据进行了比较。
第一项研究招募了200名参与者(18 - 29岁)。纸质格式和手持电脑收集的数据之间的总体一致性为86%。分类变量的一致性在70.5%至98.5%之间(kappa系数:0.43 - 0.86),而数值变量的一致性在57.1%至79.8%之间(斯皮尔曼相关系数:0.76 - 0.95)。至少完成高中学业的人之间的一致性和相关性高于受教育程度较低的人。第二项研究招募了198名参与者。两种问卷对敏感问题的回答率相似。然而,纸质问卷中的不一致数量(p = 0.0001)和缺失值数量(p = 0.001)明显更高。
本研究显示了使用手持电脑收集敏感数据的价值,因为纸质和个人数字助理回答之间达成了高度一致性。此外,基于个人数字助理的系统发现的不一致和缺失值数量较少。本研究表明,开发一种低成本的手持电脑应用程序是可行的,并且个人数字助理是在发展中国家收集现场数据的可行替代方案。