• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区中心阑尾炎的当前管理——我们如何改进?

Current management of appendicitis at a community center--how can we improve?

作者信息

Piper Hannah G, Rusnak Conrad, Orrom William, Hayashi Allen, Cunningham Johann

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and the Vancouver Island Health Authority, 1477 W 15th Ave., Suite 203, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 1S4.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2008 May;195(5):585-8; discussion 588-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.033.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.033
PMID:18367143
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversies regarding the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis remain. Practices and outcomes at a community center including imaging, timing of surgery, and surgical technique are reported.

METHODS

From January to July 2006, 134 patients undergoing appendectomy in Victoria, British Columbia, were reviewed. Accuracy of preoperative imaging, time from the emergency room to the operating room, length of stay, and early complications were analyzed. Patients with and without perforation were compared using sample t tests.

RESULTS

Preoperative computed tomography was obtained for 101 patients (75%) with a negative appendectomy rate of 3% versus 10% for patients without imaging. Imaging did not prolong the time to surgery (11.8 vs 10.9 h, P = .48). Patients with perforation stayed in the hospital significantly longer and had more complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The liberal use of computed tomography resulted in fewer negative appendectomies without a significant delay to surgery. Patients with perforation had increased complications and longer hospitalizations. Efforts should be made to identify and treat early appendicitis.

摘要

背景

阑尾炎的诊断和治疗仍存在争议。本文报告了一家社区中心在阑尾炎诊断和治疗方面的实践情况及结果,内容包括成像检查、手术时机和手术技术。

方法

回顾性分析了2006年1月至7月间在不列颠哥伦比亚省维多利亚市接受阑尾切除术的134例患者。分析了术前成像检查的准确性、从急诊室到手术室的时间、住院时间和早期并发症情况。采用样本t检验对穿孔和未穿孔患者进行比较。

结果

101例患者(75%)术前行计算机断层扫描,阴性阑尾切除率为3%;未进行成像检查的患者阴性阑尾切除率为10%。成像检查未延长手术时间(11.8小时对10.9小时,P = 0.48)。穿孔患者住院时间显著更长,并发症更多。

结论

计算机断层扫描的广泛应用减少了阴性阑尾切除术的发生,且未显著延迟手术。穿孔患者并发症增多,住院时间延长。应努力识别并早期治疗阑尾炎。

相似文献

1
Current management of appendicitis at a community center--how can we improve?社区中心阑尾炎的当前管理——我们如何改进?
Am J Surg. 2008 May;195(5):585-8; discussion 588-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.033.
2
Diagnostic accuracy and short-term surgical outcomes in cases of suspected acute appendicitis.疑似急性阑尾炎病例的诊断准确性及短期手术结果
CMAJ. 1995 May 15;152(10):1617-26.
3
Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours.将急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术延迟12至24小时的影响。
Arch Surg. 2006 May;141(5):504-6; discussioin 506-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.504.
4
Is acute appendicitis a surgical emergency?急性阑尾炎是外科急症吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):626-9; discussion 629-30.
5
Timing of intervention does not affect outcome in acute appendicitis in a large community practice.在大型社区医疗实践中,干预时机并不影响急性阑尾炎的治疗结果。
Am J Surg. 2008 May;195(5):590-2; discussion 592-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.005.
6
Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences.阑尾炎的延迟阑尾切除术:原因及后果
Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Nov;14(7):620-2. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90074-1.
7
Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review.阑尾切除术延迟及其相关并发症:一项回顾性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Mar;76(3):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03673.x.
8
Clinical versus sonographic evaluation of acute appendicitis in children: a comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes.儿童急性阑尾炎的临床评估与超声评估:患者特征及结局比较
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 May;36(5):780-3. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22960.
9
Comparison between open and laparoscopic appendectomy in non-complicated appendicitis.非复杂性阑尾炎的开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较。
Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008 Jan-Mar;100(1):20-5.
10
Laparoscopy in the contemporary management of acute appendicitis.腹腔镜检查在当代急性阑尾炎治疗中的应用
Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):310-3; discussion 313-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting delayed appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis.重新审视急性阑尾炎患者的延迟阑尾切除术
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jul 16;9(20):5372-5390. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5372.
2
Negative Appendectomy: an Audit of Resident-Performed Surgery. How Can Its Incidence Be Minimized?阴性阑尾切除术:住院医师手术的一项审计。如何将其发生率降至最低?
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):913-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1063-0. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
3
Appendicitis-the balance between cost effectiveness and safety remains challenging.阑尾炎——成本效益与安全性之间的平衡仍然具有挑战性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Apr;399(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1179-5. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
4
Enteral contrast in the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis: comparative effectiveness in a prospective surgical cohort.肠道造影剂在阑尾炎计算机断层扫描诊断中的应用:前瞻性手术队列中的比较效果
Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):311-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000272.
5
Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.阑尾炎诊断的改进。
Adv Surg. 2013;47:299-328. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2013.03.003.
6
Ideal timing of surgery for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.急性单纯性阑尾炎手术的理想时机。
N Am J Med Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):22-7. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.106186.
7
Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.阑尾炎诊断进展:华盛顿州外科护理和结果评估计划报告。
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):586-94. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826a9602.
8
The value of preoperative diagnostic tests in acute appendicitis, retrospective analysis of 196 patients.术前诊断检查在急性阑尾炎中的价值,196 例患者的回顾性分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2010 Feb 11;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-5-5.