• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阑尾切除术延迟及其相关并发症:一项回顾性研究。

Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review.

作者信息

Omundsen Mark, Dennett Elisabeth

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2006 Mar;76(3):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03673.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03673.x
PMID:16626357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective review was undertaken to determine if time between presentation and appendicectomy is a factor affecting morbidity and length of hospital stay for patients with proven appendicitis.

METHODS

The notes of patients who underwent an appendicectomy at Wellington Public Hospital, New Zealand between June 2002 and February 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Delay from admission until surgery was noted. Other variables recorded were age, sex, operation type (laparoscopic or open), white cell count, pulse rate and temperature at admission, antibiotic usage, ancillary investigations (e.g. ultrasound), operative findings, length of admission and in-hospital complications.

RESULTS

A total of 480 appendicectomies were carried out. Four hundred and fifty-seven (95%) records were retrieved, and 436 (91%) included the required information and were analysed. Ninety-one (21%) resected appendices were pathologically normal, 275 (63%) were nonperforated, 61 (14%) were perforated and 9 (2%) had appendicular abscesses. The mean waiting time from admission to operation was 14.5 h (range, 1.6-99 h). There were 36 complications in 31 (7%) patients. The mean hospital stay was 74.4 h (range, 9.2-372 h). Three hundred and forty-five admitted patients had histologically proven appendicitis. Patients who waited 12-24 h for their surgery, when compared with those that waited less than 12 h, did not have a statistically significant difference in either perforation rates (P = 0.66) or abscess formation (P = 0.14). There was also no statistically significant difference in the postoperative length of hospital stay (P = 0.6) or complication rate (P = 0.92) in patients who waited >24 h for their surgery. Patients with appendicitis who waited for >24 h (n = 44) had more abscesses (P = 0.0001). There was also a statistically significant difference in the perforation rate (P = 0.0001), postoperative length of stay (P = 0.04) and overall complication rate (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Time to surgery of up to 24 h does not lead to an increase in complicated appendicitis or morbidity. When the time exceeds 24 h, there is an increased rate of complicated appendicitis and morbidity, including complications that are not directly related to the appendicitis.

摘要

背景

进行这项回顾性研究以确定从就诊到阑尾切除的时间是否是影响确诊阑尾炎患者发病率和住院时间的一个因素。

方法

对2002年6月至2004年2月在新西兰惠灵顿公立医院接受阑尾切除术的患者病历进行回顾性研究。记录从入院到手术的延迟时间。记录的其他变量包括年龄、性别、手术类型(腹腔镜或开放手术)、入院时的白细胞计数、脉搏率和体温、抗生素使用情况、辅助检查(如超声)、手术结果、住院时间和院内并发症。

结果

共进行了480例阑尾切除术。检索到457份(95%)病历,其中436份(91%)包含所需信息并进行分析。91份(21%)切除的阑尾病理检查正常,275份(63%)未穿孔,61份(14%)穿孔,9份(2%)有阑尾脓肿。从入院到手术的平均等待时间为14.5小时(范围1.6 - 99小时)。31例(7%)患者出现36例并发症。平均住院时间为74.4小时(范围9.2 - 372小时)。345例入院患者经组织学证实为阑尾炎。等待12 - 24小时进行手术的患者与等待时间少于12小时的患者相比,穿孔率(P = 0.66)或脓肿形成率(P = 0.14)无统计学显著差异。等待手术超过24小时的患者术后住院时间(P = 0.6)或并发症发生率(P = 0.92)也无统计学显著差异。等待超过24小时的阑尾炎患者(n = 44)有更多脓肿(P = 0.0001)。穿孔率(P = 0.0001)、术后住院时间(P = 0.04)和总体并发症发生率(P = 0.01)也有统计学显著差异。

结论

手术时间长达24小时不会导致复杂性阑尾炎或发病率增加。当时间超过24小时时,复杂性阑尾炎和发病率增加,包括与阑尾炎无直接关系的并发症。

相似文献

1
Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review.阑尾切除术延迟及其相关并发症:一项回顾性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Mar;76(3):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03673.x.
2
Audit of appendicectomies at Frere Hospital, Eastern Cape.东开普省弗雷尔医院阑尾切除术审计
S Afr J Surg. 2008 Aug;46(3):74-7.
3
Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎:是否安全且合理?一项回顾性分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):142-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821ad770.
4
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
5
Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study.对于伴有阑尾包块的急性阑尾炎患儿,早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否可行?一项前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jul;40(7):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.046.
6
[Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis--a comparative study].[开放性手术与腹腔镜手术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较研究]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Apr;130(2):137-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836411.
7
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
8
Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy.穿孔性阑尾炎并非腹腔镜检查的禁忌证。
Am Surg. 1999 Oct;65(10):965-7.
9
Prevention of intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎后腹腔内脓肿的预防:一项前瞻性研究
Int J Surg. 2008 Oct;6(5):374-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
10
Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate?穿孔性阑尾炎:早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):731-7; discussion 737-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.053.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost utility analysis of antibiotics compared with operative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis.单纯性急性阑尾炎中抗生素与手术治疗的成本效用分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):14963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00111-5.
2
Preoperative in-hospital delay increases postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis.术前住院延迟增加急性阑尾炎患者术后发病率和死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1275-1284. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001938.
3
An observational study on lifestyle and environmental risk factors in patients with acute appendicitis.
一项关于急性阑尾炎患者生活方式和环境危险因素的观察性研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15131. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15131. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Alvarado or RIPASA? Which one do you use to diagnose acute appendicitis?: A cross-sectional study.阿尔瓦拉多评分还是RIPASA评分?你用哪一个来诊断急性阑尾炎?:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;6(1):e1078. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1078. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Daytime versus nighttime laparoscopic appendectomy in term of complications and clinical outcomes: A retrospective study of 1001 appendectomies.日间与夜间腹腔镜阑尾切除术在并发症和临床结局方面的比较:对1001例阑尾切除术的回顾性研究
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 30;8(12):e11911. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11911. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
In-hospital delay of surgery increases the rate of complicated appendicitis in patients presenting with short duration of symptoms: a retrospective cohort study.住院手术延迟会增加症状持续时间较短的患者发生复杂性阑尾炎的比率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3879-3886. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01912-3. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
7
Perforation rate after a diagnosis of uncomplicated appendicitis on CT.CT 诊断为单纯性阑尾炎后的穿孔率。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa034.
8
Differences between inflamed and non inflamed appendices diagnosed as acute appendicitis.诊断为急性阑尾炎的发炎阑尾与未发炎阑尾之间的差异。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 18;62:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.044. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Comparison between the specificity and sensitivity of the RIPASA and Alvarado Scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis among patients with complaints of right iliac fossa.右下腹疼痛患者中RIPASA评分系统和阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎诊断中的特异性和敏感性比较
AIMS Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020001. eCollection 2020.
10
Value of CA-125 Glycoprotein in Predicting Acute Appendicitis; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.CA-125糖蛋白在预测急性阑尾炎中的价值;一项诊断准确性研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 6;7(1):e24. eCollection 2019.