• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[某些HLA-DR差异对肾移植存活的有利影响。关于新的受者选择政策的提议]

[Favourable effects of some HLA-DR disparities on kidney graft survival. Proposal for a new recipient selection policy].

作者信息

Vereerstraeten P, Andrien M, de Pauw L, Dupont E, Goldman M, Abramowicz D, Kinnaert P

机构信息

Département médico-chirurgical de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Belgique.

出版信息

Presse Med. 1991 Nov 27;20(40):1998-2000.

PMID:1837109
Abstract

In a previous retrospective study conducted from 1980 to 1987 on 275 renal cadaveric transplants, we have shown that HLA-DR disparities between donor and recipient exerted differential effects on graft survival. Thus, the presence of DR4, DR5 and DR7 in the donor, or of DR5 in the recipient was associated with an excellent survival, whereas disparities due to the presence of DR1 and DR2 in the donor, or of DR2, DRw6 and DR7 in the recipient were detrimental for the graft. A prospective study on 158 renal cadaveric transplants performed from 1988 to 1990 yielded results that were similar to those of the retrospective study. Graft survival at 18 months was similar in recipients who had either the same DR antigens as those present in their donor or beneficial DR disparities only (83-90 percent), and significantly higher than in recipients with DR detrimental disparities only (62-65 percent). Graft survival in recipients with either mixed or neutral DR disparities occupied an intermediate position (77-78 percent). In conclusion, grafts with excellent outcome, similar to that observed in DR identical pairs, may be proposed to an ever increasing number of patients awaiting a renal transplant by adopting a selection policy based on the choice of beneficial DR disparities when a DR identical recipient is not available in the pool.

摘要

在1980年至1987年对275例尸体肾移植进行的一项回顾性研究中,我们发现供体和受体之间的HLA - DR差异对移植物存活有不同影响。因此,供体中存在DR4、DR5和DR7,或受体中存在DR5与良好的存活率相关,而供体中存在DR1和DR2,或受体中存在DR2、DRw6和DR7导致的差异对移植物是有害的。1988年至1990年对158例尸体肾移植进行的一项前瞻性研究得出了与回顾性研究相似的结果。在与供体具有相同DR抗原或仅存在有益DR差异的受体中,18个月时的移植物存活率相似(83% - 90%),且显著高于仅存在有害DR差异的受体(62% - 65%)。具有混合或中性DR差异的受体的移植物存活率处于中间位置(77% - 78%)。总之,当在等待肾移植的患者群体中没有DR相同的受体时,通过采用基于有益DR差异选择的策略,可以为越来越多的患者提供与DR相同配对中观察到的类似良好结果的移植物。

相似文献

1
[Favourable effects of some HLA-DR disparities on kidney graft survival. Proposal for a new recipient selection policy].[某些HLA-DR差异对肾移植存活的有利影响。关于新的受者选择政策的提议]
Presse Med. 1991 Nov 27;20(40):1998-2000.
2
[Identification of HLA-DR antigenic disparities favorable and unfavorable in renal transplantation].
Nephrologie. 1989;10(1):33-8.
3
Influence of donor-recipient HLA-DR mismatches and OKT3 prophylaxis on cadaver kidney graft survival.
Transplantation. 1995 Aug 15;60(3):253-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199508000-00008.
4
Beneficial effects of some donor-recipient HLA-DR mismatches on cadaveric graft survival: proposal for a new selection policy of recipients.供体与受体某些HLA-DR错配在尸体移植存活中的有益作用:受体新选择策略的建议
Transplant Proc. 1991 Feb;23(1 Pt 1):385-6.
5
The UNOS Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 2002:1-20.
6
HLA-DR associated immune responsiveness.HLA-DR相关的免疫反应性。
Clin Transpl. 1986:247-56.
7
The UNOS renal transplant registry.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 2001:1-18.
8
The influence of HLA-DR match on cadaveric renal graft survival. Experience from Stockholm.
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1981;64:38-45.
9
The changing role of HLA matching.人类白细胞抗原匹配的角色转变
Clin Transpl. 1986:141-55.
10
HLA-DR matching in organ allocation: balance between waiting time and rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation.器官分配中的人类白细胞抗原-DR匹配:小儿肾移植中等待时间与排斥反应之间的平衡
Arch Surg. 2011 Jul;146(7):824-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.147.