Kennedy Sherry, Young Wendy, Schull Michael J, Isaac Winston
Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
CJEM. 2008 Mar;10(2):120-4. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500009829.
In February 2007, the Health Council of Canada, in its third annual report, emphasized the need for pan-Canadian data on our health care system. To date, no studies have examined the strengths and weaknesses of emergency health services (EHS) administrative databases, as perceived by researchers. We undertook a qualitative study to determine, from a researcher's perspective, the strengths and weaknesses of EHS administrative databases. The study also elicited researchers' suggestions to improve these databases.
We conducted taped interviews with 4 Canadian health services researchers. The transcriptions were subsequently examined for common concepts, which were finalized after discussion with all the investigators.
Five common themes emerged from the interviews: clinical detail, data quality, data linkage, data use and population coverage. Data use and data linkages were considered strengths. Clinical detail, data quality and population coverage were considered weaknesses.
The 5 themes that emerged from this study all serve to reinforce the call from the Health Council of Canada for national data on emergency services, which could be readily captured through a national EHS administrative database. We feel that key stakeholders involved in emergency services across Canada should work together to develop a strategy to implement an accurate, clinically detailed, integrated and comprehensive national EHS database.
2007年2月,加拿大卫生理事会在其第三份年度报告中强调,需要有关我们医疗保健系统的全加拿大数据。迄今为止,尚无研究考察过研究人员所认为的紧急医疗服务(EHS)管理数据库的优缺点。我们开展了一项定性研究,从研究人员的角度确定EHS管理数据库的优缺点。该研究还征集了研究人员对改进这些数据库的建议。
我们对4名加拿大卫生服务研究人员进行了录音采访。随后对访谈记录进行了分析,以找出共同的概念,并在与所有调查人员讨论后确定下来。
访谈中出现了五个共同主题:临床细节、数据质量、数据链接、数据使用和人群覆盖范围。数据使用和数据链接被认为是优点。临床细节、数据质量和人群覆盖范围被认为是缺点。
本研究中出现的这五个主题都进一步呼应了加拿大卫生理事会对紧急服务全国数据的呼吁,这些数据可以通过全国性的EHS管理数据库轻松获取。我们认为,加拿大各地参与紧急服务的主要利益相关者应共同努力,制定一项战略,以实施一个准确、临床细节丰富、综合且全面的全国性EHS数据库。