Suppr超能文献

来自两个北美社区护理计划前线的观点:一项观察性的人种志研究。

Perspectives from the frontline of two North American community paramedicine programs: an observational, ethnographic study.

作者信息

Martin Angela C, O'Meara Peter

机构信息

LaTrobe Rural Health School, LaTrobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, Vic. 3552, Australia

Department of Community Emergency health & Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria

出版信息

Rural Remote Health. 2019 Feb;19(1):4888. doi: 10.22605/RRH4888. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community paramedicine is one emerging model filling gaps in rural healthcare delivery. It can expand the reach of primary care and public health service provision in underserviced rural communities through proactive engagement of paramedics in preventative care and chronic disease management. This study addressed key research priorities identified at the National Agenda for Community Paramedicine Research conference in Atlanta, USA in 2012. The motivations, job satisfaction and challenges from the perspectives of community paramedics and their managers pioneering two independent programs in rural North America were identified.

METHODS

An observational ethnographic approach was used to acquire qualitative data from participants, through informal discussions, semi-structured interviews, focus groups and direct observation of practice. During field trips over two summers, researchers purposively recruited participants from Ontario, Canada and Colorado, USA. These sites were selected on the basis of uncomplicated facilitation of ethics and institutional approval, the diversity of the programs and willingness of service managers to welcome researchers. Thematic analysis techniques were adopted for transcribing, de-identifying and coding data that allowed identification of common themes.

RESULTS

This study highlighted that the innovative nature of the community paramedic role can leave practitioners feeling misunderstood and unsupported by their peers. Three themes emerged: the motivators driving participation, the transitional challenges facing practitioners and the characteristics of paramedics engaged in these roles. A major motivator is the growing use of ambulances for non-emergency calls and the associated need to develop strategies to combat this phenomenon. This has prompted paramedic service managers to engage stakeholders to explore ways they could be more proactive in health promotion and hospital avoidance. Community paramedicine programs are fostering collaborative partnerships between disciplines, while the positive outcomes for patients and health cost savings are tangible motivators for paramedic services and funders. Paramedics were motivated by a genuine desire to make a difference and attracted to the innovative nature of a role delivering preventative care options for patients. Transitional challenges included lack of self-regulation, navigating untraditional roles and managing role boundary tensions between disciplines. Community paramedics in this study were largely self-selected, genuinely interested in the concept and proactively engaged in the grassroots development of these programs. These paramedics were comfortable integrating and operating within multidisciplinary teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved education and communication from paramedic service management with staff and external stakeholders might improve transitional processes and better support a culture of inclusivity for community paramedicine programs. Experienced and highly motivated paramedics with excellent communication and interpersonal skills should be considered for community paramedic roles. Practitioners who are proactive about community paramedicine and self-nominate for positions transition more easily into the role: they tend to see the 'bigger picture', have broader insight into public health issues and the benefits of integrative health care. They are more likely to achieve higher job satisfaction, remain in the role longer, and contribute to better long-term program outcomes. Paramedic services and policymakers can use these findings to incentivize career pathways in community paramedicine and understand those changes that might better support this innovative model.

摘要

引言

社区护理是一种新兴模式,可填补农村医疗服务的空白。通过护理人员积极参与预防保健和慢性病管理,它能够扩大初级保健和公共卫生服务在服务不足的农村社区的覆盖范围。本研究解决了2012年在美国亚特兰大举行的社区护理研究全国议程会议确定的关键研究重点。确定了北美农村地区开展两个独立项目的社区护理人员及其管理人员的动机、工作满意度和挑战。

方法

采用观察性人种志方法,通过非正式讨论、半结构化访谈、焦点小组和实践直接观察,从参与者那里获取定性数据。在两个夏天的实地考察期间,研究人员有目的地从加拿大安大略省和美国科罗拉多州招募参与者。选择这些地点是基于伦理和机构审批手续简便、项目的多样性以及服务管理人员欢迎研究人员的意愿。采用主题分析技术对数据进行转录、去识别和编码,以便识别共同主题。

结果

本研究强调,社区护理人员角色的创新性可能会让从业者感到被同行误解和缺乏支持。出现了三个主题:推动参与的动机、从业者面临的过渡挑战以及从事这些角色的护理人员的特点。一个主要动机是救护车用于非紧急呼叫的情况日益增多,以及随之而来的制定应对这一现象策略的需求。这促使护理服务管理人员与利益相关者合作,探索他们在促进健康和避免住院方面更积极主动的方式。社区护理项目正在促进各学科之间的合作伙伴关系,而对患者的积极结果和医疗成本节约对护理服务和资助者来说是切实的激励因素。护理人员受到真正想要有所作为的愿望的激励,并被为患者提供预防保健选择这一角色的创新性所吸引。过渡挑战包括缺乏自我监管、应对非传统角色以及管理各学科之间的角色边界紧张关系。本研究中的社区护理人员大多是自我选择的,对这一概念真正感兴趣,并积极参与这些项目的基层发展。这些护理人员能够自如地在多学科团队中融合和工作。

结论

护理服务管理部门与工作人员及外部利益相关者之间加强教育和沟通,可能会改善过渡过程,并更好地支持社区护理项目的包容文化。应考虑让经验丰富且积极性高、具备出色沟通和人际交往能力的护理人员担任社区护理角色。积极参与社区护理并自我推荐担任相关职位的从业者更容易过渡到该角色:他们往往能够看到“大局”,对公共卫生问题和综合医疗保健的益处有更广泛的见解。他们更有可能获得更高的工作满意度,在该岗位上任职时间更长,并为更好的长期项目成果做出贡献。护理服务部门和政策制定者可以利用这些研究结果,激励社区护理领域的职业发展路径,并了解那些可能更好地支持这一创新模式的变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验