Rodrigue James R, Cornell Danielle L, Kaplan Bruce, Howard Richard J
The Transplant Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Apr;51(4):663-70. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.027. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
Blacks are disproportionately affected by chronic kidney disease, but are far less likely to undergo live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) than whites. We assessed the differential effectiveness in blacks and whites of a home-based (HB) LDKT educational approach.
A planned secondary analysis of a previously published randomized trial.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 132 patients (60 black, 72 white) approved for kidney transplantation at 1 kidney transplant center in the southeastern United States.
Assignment to receive either standard clinic-based (CB) transplant education (n = 69) or CB plus an HB (CB + HB) LDKT education program (n = 63). The HB education program was culturally sensitive for blacks, including using a minority health educator, brochures that highlight minority transplant recipients and donors, and discussion of race-specific outcome data.
Primary outcomes were proportions of patients with live donor inquiries, evaluations, and transplants 1 year after study participation.
Medical record and questionnaire data.
69 patients were assigned to the CB group, and 63 to the CB + HB group. After 1 year, there were 96 living donor inquiries (72.7%), 62 living donor evaluations (47.0%), and 54 LDKTs (40.9%). Patients assigned to the CB + HB group were more likely to have had living donor inquiries (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.0), a living donor evaluated (OR, 2.7; CI, 1.4 to 5.4), and LDKT (OR, 3.0; CI, 1.5 to 5.9). The effect was greater in blacks than whites for living donor evaluations and LDKT, but not for living donor inquiries (treatment-by-race interaction, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.8, respectively). Blacks in the CB + HB group were more likely to have had at least 1 living donor inquiry (51.7% versus 77.4%), at least 1 living donor evaluated (17.2% versus 48.4%), and LDKT (13.8% versus 45.2%) than those in the CB group. By comparison, whites in the CB + HB group were more likely to have had at least 1 living donor inquiry (72.5% versus 87.5%), at least 1 living donor evaluated (47.5% versus 71.9%), and LDKT (42.5% versus 59.4%) than those in the CB group.
Single-center study with greater dropout rate in the CB + HB group.
These results suggest that a culturally sensitive LDKT education program that reaches out to blacks and their social support network can overcome some barriers to LDKT in this population.
黑人受慢性肾病的影响尤为严重,但与白人相比,接受活体供肾移植(LDKT)的可能性要小得多。我们评估了一种基于家庭(HB)的LDKT教育方法对黑人和白人的不同效果。
对先前发表的一项随机试验进行计划中的二次分析。
美国东南部1家肾移植中心批准进行肾移植的132例患者(60例黑人,72例白人)。
分配患者接受基于标准门诊(CB)的移植教育(n = 69)或CB加HB的LDKT教育计划(n = 63)。HB教育计划对黑人具有文化敏感性,包括使用少数族裔健康教育者、突出少数族裔移植受者和供者的宣传册,以及讨论种族特异性结局数据。
主要结局是研究参与1年后有活体供者咨询、评估和移植的患者比例。
病历和问卷调查数据。
69例患者被分配到CB组,63例被分配到CB + HB组。1年后,有96例进行了活体供者咨询(72.7%),62例进行了活体供者评估(47.0%),54例进行了LDKT(40.9%)。分配到CB + HB组的患者更有可能进行活体供者咨询(优势比[OR],1.7;置信区间[CI],1.2至3.0)、有活体供者接受评估(OR,2.7;CI,1.4至5.4)以及进行LDKT(OR,3.0;CI,1.5至5.9)。对于活体供者评估和LDKT,黑人的效果大于白人,但对于活体供者咨询并非如此(治疗与种族的交互作用,P分别为<0.001、<0.001和0.8)。CB + HB组中的黑人比CB组中的黑人更有可能至少有1次活体供者咨询(51.7%对77.4%)、至少有1次活体供者接受评估(分别为17.2%对48.4%)以及进行LDKT(分别为13.8%对45.2%)。相比之下,CB + HB组中的白人比CB组中的白人更有可能至少有1次活体供者咨询(72.5%对87.5%)、至少有1次活体供者接受评估(47.5%对71.9%)以及进行LDKT(42.5%对59.4%)。
单中心研究,CB + HB组的失访率更高。
这些结果表明,一种对黑人及其社会支持网络具有文化敏感性的LDKT教育计划可以克服该人群中LDKT的一些障碍。