Gadelkareem Rabea Ahmed, Abdelgawad Amr Mostafa, Mohammed Nasreldin, Zarzour Mohammed Ali, Khalil Mahmoud, Reda Ahmed, Hammouda Hisham Mokhtar
Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt.
World J Methodol. 2024 Jun 20;14(2):91626. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.91626.
Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal form of renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal diseases. However, this health service is not available to all patients, especially in developing countries. The deceased donor KT programs are mostly absent, and the living donor KT centers are scarce. Single-center studies presenting experiences from developing countries usually report a variety of challenges. This review addresses these challenges and the opposing strategies by reviewing the single-center experiences of developing countries. The financial challenges hamper the infrastructural and material availability, coverage of transplant costs, and qualification of medical personnel. The sociocultural challenges influence organ donation, equity of beneficence, and regular follow-up work. Low interests and motives for transplantation may result from high medicolegal responsibilities in KT practice, intense potential psychosocial burdens, complex qualification protocols, and low productivity or compensation for KT practice. Low medical literacy about KT advantages is prevalent among clinicians, patients, and the public. The inefficient organizational and regulatory oversight is translated into inefficient healthcare systems, absent national KT programs and registries, uncoordinated job descriptions and qualification protocols, uncoordinated on-site investigations with regulatory constraints, and the prevalence of commercial KT practices. These challenges resulted in noticeable differences between KT services in developed and developing countries. The coping strategies can be summarized in two main mechanisms: The first mechanism is maximizing the available resources by increasing the rates of living kidney donation, promoting the expertise of medical personnel, reducing material consumption, and supporting the establishment and maintenance of KT programs. The latter warrants the expansion of the public sector and the elimination of non-ethical KT practices. The second mechanism is recruiting external resources, including financial, experience, and training agreements.
肾移植(KT)是终末期肾病患者肾脏替代治疗的最佳形式。然而,并非所有患者都能获得这项医疗服务,尤其是在发展中国家。脑死亡供体肾移植项目大多缺失,活体供体肾移植中心也很稀少。来自发展中国家的单中心研究报告了各种挑战。本综述通过回顾发展中国家的单中心经验,探讨了这些挑战及相应的应对策略。经济挑战阻碍了基础设施和物资供应、移植费用的覆盖范围以及医务人员的资质。社会文化挑战影响器官捐赠、受益公平性以及定期随访工作。肾移植实践中较高的法医学责任、潜在的巨大心理社会负担、复杂的资质认定流程以及肾移植实践中较低的生产率或报酬,可能导致对移植的兴趣和动机较低。临床医生、患者和公众对肾移植优势的医学知识了解普遍不足。组织和监管监督效率低下导致医疗系统效率低下、缺乏国家肾移植项目和登记处、工作职责和资质认定流程不协调、受监管限制的现场调查不协调以及商业肾移植行为盛行。这些挑战导致发达国家和发展中国家的肾移植服务存在显著差异。应对策略可归纳为两种主要机制:第一种机制是通过提高活体肾捐赠率、提升医务人员专业水平、减少物资消耗以及支持肾移植项目的建立和维持来最大限度地利用现有资源。后者需要扩大公共部门并消除不符合伦理的肾移植行为。第二种机制是获取外部资源,包括资金、经验和培训协议。