Suppr超能文献

晕厥可预测心肌病患者的预后:SCD-HeFT研究分析

Syncope predicts the outcome of cardiomyopathy patients: analysis of the SCD-HeFT study.

作者信息

Olshansky Brian, Poole Jeanne E, Johnson George, Anderson Jill, Hellkamp Anne S, Packer Douglas, Mark Daniel B, Lee Kerry L, Bardy Gust H

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 1;51(13):1277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.065.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The outcome of congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with syncope is understood incompletely.

BACKGROUND

We analyzed data from patients enrolled in the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Failure Trial) to determine whether syncope predicted outcomes in patients with CHF.

METHODS

We compared outcomes (and associated clinical characteristics) in patients with and without syncope enrolled in SCD-HeFT.

RESULTS

In SCD-HeFT, 162 (6%) patients had syncope before randomization, 356 (14%) had syncope after randomization (similar incidence in each randomized arm), and 46 (2%) had syncope before and after randomization. A QRS duration >or=120 ms and absence of beta-blocker use predicted syncope during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30 and 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.61, p = 0.014 and HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.56, p = 0.048, respectively). Syncope recurrence did not differ by randomization arm. However, in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) arm, syncope, before and after randomization, was associated with appropriate ICD discharges (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.80, p = 0.019 and HR 2.91, 95% CI 1.89 to 4.47, p = 0.001, respectively). Post-randomization syncope predicted total and cardiovascular death (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.76, p = 0.002 and HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.02, p = 0.001, respectively). The elevated relative risk of mortality for syncope versus non-syncope patients did not vary significantly across treatment arms (ICD, HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.27; amiodarone, HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.93; and placebo, HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.02, test for difference p = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

For CHF patients with ICDs, syncope was associated with appropriate ICD activations. Syncope was associated with increased mortality risk in SCD-HeFT regardless of treatment arm (placebo, amiodarone, or ICD).

摘要

目的

对充血性心力衰竭(CHF)合并晕厥患者的预后了解尚不充分。

背景

我们分析了参与SCD-HeFT(心脏性猝死心力衰竭试验)患者的数据,以确定晕厥是否可预测CHF患者的预后。

方法

我们比较了SCD-HeFT中有无晕厥患者的预后(及相关临床特征)。

结果

在SCD-HeFT中,162例(6%)患者在随机分组前有晕厥,356例(14%)在随机分组后有晕厥(各随机分组组发生率相似),46例(2%)在随机分组前后均有晕厥。QRS时限≥120毫秒且未使用β受体阻滞剂可预测随访期间的晕厥(风险比[HR]1.30,95%置信区间[CI]1.06至1.61,p = 0.014;HR 1.25,95%CI 1.01至1.56,p = 0.048)。晕厥复发在各随机分组组间无差异。然而,在植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)组,随机分组前后的晕厥与ICD恰当放电有关(HR 1.75,95%CI 1.10至2.80,p = 0.019;HR 2.91,95%CI 1.89至4.47,p = 0.001)。随机分组后的晕厥可预测全因死亡和心血管死亡(HR 1.41,95%CI 1.13至1.76,p = 0.002;HR 1.55,95%CI 1.19至2.02,p = 0.001)。晕厥患者与非晕厥患者相比,死亡率相对风险升高在各治疗组间无显著差异(ICD组,HR 1.54,95%CI 1.04至2.27;胺碘酮组,HR 1.33,95%CI 0.91至1.93;安慰剂组,HR 1.39,95%CI 0.96至2.02,差异检验p = 0.86)。

结论

对于植入ICD的CHF患者,晕厥与ICD恰当激活有关。在SCD-HeFT中,无论治疗组(安慰剂、胺碘酮或ICD)如何,晕厥均与死亡风险增加有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验