Suppr超能文献

右心:在冠状动脉CT血管造影中采用稀释造影剂的分次团注法进行显影。

Right heart: split-bolus injection of diluted contrast medium for visualization at coronary CT angiography.

作者信息

Kerl J Matthias, Ravenel James G, Nguyen Shaun A, Suranyi Pal, Thilo Christian, Costello Philip, Bautz Werner, Schoepf U Joseph

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 169 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):356-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070856. Epub 2008 Mar 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare a split-bolus contrast medium injection protocol with a biphasic and a monophasic protocol in terms of visualization of the right and left heart, contrast medium-related streak artifacts, and level of attenuation in the cardiac chambers and coronary arteries at coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The human research committee approved this HIPAA-compliant study and waived informed consent. Seventy-five patients had undergone 64-section coronary CT angiography: 25 were injected by using a monophasic, contrast-medium-only protocol with a single-syringe injector; 25 were injected by using a biphasic protocol with a dual-syringe injector; and 25 were injected by using a split-bolus protocol with a dual-syringe injector and an initial bolus of contrast medium followed by 50 mL of a 70%:30% saline-to-contrast medium mixture and a 30-mL saline chaser. Two radiologists rated the visualization of right and left heart structures and the degree of streak artifacts. One observer performed attenuation measurements of the cardiac chambers and of the coronary arteries. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan post-hoc multiple comparison procedures.

RESULTS

Data for 27 women and 48 men (mean age, 62 years) were included. Mean contrast medium attenuation in the right heart was significantly (P < .001) higher in the split-bolus group than in the biphasic injection group but was significantly (P < .001) lower than in the monophasic injection group. For the left heart and the coronary arteries, there were no significant differences among the three groups. Artifacts occurred less frequently (P < .001) in the biphasic and split-bolus groups than in the monophasic group. Visualization of right heart structures was rated significantly (P < .05) better in the split-bolus group than in the two other groups, while there was no difference for visualization of left heart structures.

CONCLUSION

Split-bolus injection provides sufficient attenuation for visualization of the right heart, while streak artifacts from high-attenuation contrast material can generally be avoided and arterial attenuation is maintained.

摘要

目的

在冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影中,回顾性比较团注分割造影剂注射方案与双期和单期方案在左右心显影、造影剂相关条纹伪影以及心腔和冠状动脉衰减水平方面的差异。

材料与方法

人体研究委员会批准了这项符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的研究,并免除了知情同意。75例患者接受了64层冠状动脉CT血管造影:25例采用单期、仅造影剂方案,使用单注射器注射;25例采用双期方案,使用双注射器注射;25例采用团注分割方案,使用双注射器注射,先注射初始造影剂团注,随后注射50 mL 70%:30%的生理盐水与造影剂混合液,再注射30 mL生理盐水冲管。两名放射科医生对左右心结构的显影情况和条纹伪影程度进行评分。一名观察者对心腔和冠状动脉进行衰减测量。数据采用单因素方差分析和邓肯事后多重比较程序进行分析。

结果

纳入了27名女性和48名男性(平均年龄62岁)的数据。团注分割组右心的平均造影剂衰减显著高于双期注射组(P <.001),但显著低于单期注射组(P <.001)。对于左心和冠状动脉,三组之间无显著差异。双期和团注分割组的伪影出现频率低于单期组(P <.001)。团注分割组右心结构的显影评分显著高于其他两组(P <.05),而左心结构显影无差异。

结论

团注分割注射可为右心显影提供足够的衰减,同时通常可避免高衰减造影剂产生的条纹伪影,并维持动脉衰减。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验