Feldstein A C, Schneider J, Smith D H, Vollmer W M, Rix M, Glauber H, Boardman D L, Herson M
Northwest Permanente, Portland, OR, USA.
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Nov;19(11):1527-40. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0605-3. Epub 2008 Mar 29.
This study used in-depth interviews and focus groups to evaluate osteoporosis care after a fracture. Patients (eligible women aged 67 who sustained a clinical fracture(s)), clinicians, and staff stated that an outreach program facilitated osteoporosis care management, but more-tailored education and support and increased participation of orthopedic specialists appear necessary.
Osteoporosis treatment reduces fracture risk, but screening and treatment are underutilized, even after a fracture has occurred. This study evaluated key stakeholder perspectives about the care of osteoporosis after a fracture.
Participants were from a nonprofit health maintenance organization in the United States: eligible women members aged 67 or older who sustained a clinical fracture(s) (n = 10), quality and other health care managers (n = 20), primary care providers (n = 9), and orthopedic clinicians and staff (n = 28); total n = 67. In-depth interviews and focus groups elicited participant perspectives on an outreach program to patients and clinicians and other facilitators and barriers to care. Interviews and focus group sessions were transcribed and content-analyzed.
Patients, clinicians, and staff stated that outreach facilitated osteoporosis care management, but important patient barriers remained. Patient knowledge gaps and fatalism were common. Providers stated that management needed to begin earlier, and longer-term patient support was necessary to address adherence. Orthopedic clinicians and staff expressed lack of confidence in their osteoporosis management but willingness to encourage treatment.
Although an outreach program assisted with the management of osteoporosis after a fracture, more-tailored education and support and increased participation of orthopedic specialists appear necessary to maximize osteoporosis management.
本研究采用深入访谈和焦点小组讨论来评估骨折后骨质疏松症的护理情况。患者(年龄67岁的符合条件的临床骨折女性)、临床医生和工作人员表示,一个外展项目有助于骨质疏松症护理管理,但似乎需要更具针对性的教育和支持以及增加骨科专家的参与。
骨质疏松症治疗可降低骨折风险,但筛查和治疗的利用率较低,即使在发生骨折后也是如此。本研究评估了关键利益相关者对骨折后骨质疏松症护理的看法。
参与者来自美国一家非营利性健康维护组织:年龄67岁及以上且发生临床骨折的符合条件的女性成员(n = 10)、质量和其他医疗保健管理人员(n = 20)、初级保健提供者(n = 9)以及骨科临床医生和工作人员(n = 28);总计n = 67。通过深入访谈和焦点小组讨论,收集参与者对针对患者和临床医生的外展项目以及其他护理促进因素和障碍的看法。对访谈和焦点小组会议进行转录并进行内容分析。
患者、临床医生和工作人员表示,外展项目有助于骨质疏松症护理管理,但重要的患者障碍仍然存在。患者知识差距和宿命论很常见。提供者表示,管理需要更早开始,并且需要长期的患者支持来解决依从性问题。骨科临床医生和工作人员表示对骨质疏松症管理缺乏信心,但愿意鼓励治疗。
尽管一个外展项目有助于骨折后骨质疏松症的管理,但似乎需要更具针对性的教育和支持以及增加骨科专家的参与,以最大限度地提高骨质疏松症管理水平。