Daniels Stephen, Gitton Xavier, Zhou Wenchun, Stricker Kirstin, Barton Scott
Scirex Clinical Research Centers, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;17(3):423-37. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0416.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are established as treatment for managing pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea. However, the efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib 200 mg once daily (q.d.) has not previously been examined in primary dysmenorrhea.
Two randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies of similar design have assessed the efficacy and tolerability of two regimens of lumiracoxib compared with placebo (Study 1) or naproxen and placebo (Study 2) in women (aged 18-45 years) with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea. In Study 1 (n = 132), patients received lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d., lumiracoxib 200 mg with a 200 mg redose (p.r.n.) on day 1, or placebo. In Study 2 (n = 144), patients received lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d., lumiracoxib 200 mg with a 200 mg redose p.r.n. on day 1, naproxen 500 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), or placebo. Patients recorded study medication use, efficacy assessments, and rescue medication use.
The primary efficacy variable, summed (time-weighted) pain intensity difference (categorical scale) over the first 8 hours (SPID-8), was similar between all active treatments (e.g., p = 0.939 for naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. vs. lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. in Study 2), and all active treatments were superior to placebo (p < 0.001). Median time-to-onset of analgesia was similar between lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. and naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. Similar trends were observed for all other secondary efficacy variables. All treatments were well tolerated.
Short-term administration of lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. is effective and well tolerated and provides an alternative treatment option for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea.
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)已被确立为治疗原发性痛经相关疼痛的药物。然而,每日一次服用200毫克鲁米昔布(q.d.)治疗原发性痛经的疗效和耐受性此前尚未得到研究。
两项设计相似的随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究评估了两种鲁米昔布治疗方案与安慰剂(研究1)或萘普生及安慰剂(研究2)相比,在18 - 45岁中度至重度原发性痛经女性中的疗效和耐受性。在研究1(n = 132)中,患者接受每日一次200毫克鲁米昔布、第1天服用200毫克鲁米昔布并按需追加200毫克(p.r.n.)或安慰剂治疗。在研究2(n = 144)中,患者接受每日一次200毫克鲁米昔布、第1天服用200毫克鲁米昔布并按需追加200毫克、每日两次500毫克萘普生(b.i.d.)或安慰剂治疗。患者记录研究药物使用情况、疗效评估和急救药物使用情况。
主要疗效变量,即前8小时的累积(时间加权)疼痛强度差值(分类量表)(SPID - 8),在所有活性治疗组之间相似(例如,研究2中每日两次500毫克萘普生与每日一次200毫克鲁米昔布相比,p = 0.939),且所有活性治疗组均优于安慰剂(p < 0.001)。每日一次200毫克鲁米昔布和每日两次500毫克萘普生的镇痛起效中位时间相似。所有其他次要疗效变量也观察到类似趋势。所有治疗耐受性良好。
每日一次服用200毫克鲁米昔布短期治疗有效且耐受性良好,为治疗原发性痛经相关的中度至重度疼痛提供了一种替代治疗选择。