Hawkey Christopher J, Ell Christian, Simon Bernd, Albert Jörg, Keuchel Martin, McAlindon Mark, Fortun Paul, Schumann Stefan, Bolten Wolfgang, Shonde Anthony, Hugot Jean-Louis, Yu Vincent, Arulmani Udayasankar, Krammer Gerhard, Rebuli Rosemary, Toth Ervin
Wolfson Digestive Diseases Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 May;6(5):536-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.023. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor lumiracoxib has been shown to reduce endoscopically detected ulcers and ulcer complications in the upper gastrointestinal tract compared with nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We investigated whether lumiracoxib would reduce small-bowel injury compared with naproxen plus omeprazole.
Healthy volunteers were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily, naproxen 500 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg once daily, or placebo in a 16-day double-blind, parallel-group study. Small-bowel mucosal injury and inflammation were assessed by video capsule endoscopy, the lactulose:L-rhamnose permeability assessment, and the fecal calprotectin test.
Of 152 randomized subjects, 139 completed the study with valid video capsule endoscopies (lumiracoxib, n = 47; naproxen plus omeprazole, n = 45; placebo, n = 47). Compared with placebo, an increased number of subjects on naproxen plus omeprazole had small-bowel mucosal breaks (77.8% vs 40.4%, P < .001), with increased permeability (P = .023) and increased fecal calprotectin (increase, 96.8 vs 14.5 mg/kg for placebo; P < .001). With lumiracoxib, 27.7% of subjects had small-bowel mucosal breaks (P = .196 vs placebo; P < .001 vs naproxen), there was no increase in permeability (P = .157 vs placebo; P = .364 vs naproxen), and no increase in fecal calprotectin (-5.7 mg/kg; P = .377 vs placebo; P < .001 vs naproxen).
As assessed by 3 different measures, acute small-bowel injury on lumiracoxib treatment is less frequent than with naproxen plus omeprazole and similar to placebo.
与非选择性非甾体抗炎药相比,选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂氯美昔布已被证明可减少内镜检查发现的上消化道溃疡及溃疡并发症。我们研究了与萘普生加奥美拉唑相比,氯美昔布是否能减少小肠损伤。
在一项为期16天的双盲、平行组研究中,健康志愿者被随机分配接受每日一次100毫克氯美昔布、每日两次500毫克萘普生加每日一次20毫克奥美拉唑或安慰剂治疗。通过视频胶囊内镜检查、乳果糖:L-鼠李糖渗透性评估和粪便钙卫蛋白检测来评估小肠黏膜损伤和炎症。
152名随机分组的受试者中,139名完成了具有有效视频胶囊内镜检查结果的研究(氯美昔布组,n = 47;萘普生加奥美拉唑组,n = 45;安慰剂组,n = 47)。与安慰剂相比,服用萘普生加奥美拉唑的受试者出现小肠黏膜破损的人数增加(77.8%对40.4%,P <.001),渗透性增加(P =.023),粪便钙卫蛋白增加(安慰剂组增加96.8对14.5毫克/千克;P <.001)。服用氯美昔布的受试者中,27.7%出现小肠黏膜破损(与安慰剂相比,P =.196;与萘普生相比,P <.001),渗透性未增加(与安慰剂相比,P =.157;与萘普生相比,P =.364),粪便钙卫蛋白也未增加(-5.7毫克/千克;与安慰剂相比,P =.377;与萘普生相比,P <.001)。
通过三种不同测量方法评估,氯美昔布治疗引起的急性小肠损伤比萘普生加奥美拉唑少见,与安慰剂相似。