Saunders Buddy, Farag Noha, Vincent Andrea S, Collins Frank L, Sorocco Kristen H, Lovallo William R
Behavioral Sciences Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73134, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 May;32(5):888-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00648.x. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
BACKGROUND: Behavioral undercontrol may contribute to risk for alcoholism in vulnerable persons. We predicted that healthy young adults with a family history of alcoholism (FH+) who also displayed externalizing behavior characteristics (low scores on the California Psychological Inventory Sociability Scale; CPI-So) would exhibit more impulsive responding (false alarms) on a Go-NoGo reaction time task. METHODS: Subjects were 230 healthy volunteers, 18 to 30 years of age with no history of alcohol or drug dependence. The task included 100 trials: 60 of "Go," calling for a button press, and 40 of "NoGo," or "XX," calling for inhibiting a response. Data analysis involved a signal detection analysis of performance with subsequent group comparisons for rates of impulsive responding indicated by False Alarms (responses to NoGo signals). RESULTS: CPI-So scores were lower in FH+ than in FH- (p < .000001) indicating a greater clustering of disinhibitory tendencies in these persons. FH, CPI-So scores, and Gender together predicted false alarm rates, accounting for 4.9% of the variance, F = 3.89, p = 0.009. False alarms were associated with low CPI-So scores, F = 5.15, p = 0.024, and being male, F = 6.27, p = 0.013, but not with FH once these variables were accounted for. CONCLUSIONS: A disinhibited temperament may underlie a behavioral impulsivity that contributes to elevated risk for future alcoholism, especially among FH+ males.
背景:行为自控能力不足可能会增加易患酒精中毒人群的患病风险。我们预测,有酗酒家族史(FH+)且表现出外化行为特征(加利福尼亚心理调查表社交性量表得分低;CPI-So)的健康年轻成年人在Go-NoGo反应时任务中会表现出更多的冲动反应(误报)。 方法:研究对象为230名健康志愿者,年龄在18至30岁之间,无酒精或药物依赖史。该任务包括100次试验:60次“Go”试验,要求按下按钮;40次“NoGo”试验,即“XX”试验,要求抑制反应。数据分析包括对表现的信号检测分析,随后对误报(对NoGo信号的反应)所表明的冲动反应率进行组间比较。 结果:FH+组的CPI-So得分低于FH-组(p <.000001),表明这些人抑制倾向的聚集性更强。FH、CPI-So得分和性别共同预测了误报率,解释了4.9%的方差,F = 3.89,p = 0.009。误报与低CPI-So得分(F = 5.15,p = 0.024)和男性(F = 6.27,p = 0.013)相关,但在考虑这些变量后与FH无关。 结论:抑制不足的气质可能是行为冲动的基础,这会增加未来患酒精中毒的风险,尤其是在FH+男性中。
Behav Brain Res. 2002-11-15
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016-10
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017-12-6
Children (Basel). 2025-7-31
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022-9-16
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022-12
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008-7
Neuroimage. 2007-11-15
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2002-9
Addict Behav. 2007-5
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006-4