Myers Anita M, Paradis Josee A, Blanchard Robin A
Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):630-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.037.
To examine and measure driving confidence from the perspective of older adults.
Used focus groups for construct examination, item generation, and ratings; conducted psychometric testing using Rasch analysis for scale refinement; examined test-retest reliability and associations with driver characteristics and driving habits.
Retirement complexes and seniors' housing and centers in Ontario, Canada.
Convenience samples of current drivers (n=143) (range, 66-92y) and 7 counselors.
Not applicable.
The Day (DCS-D) and Night (DCS-N) Driving Comfort Scales developed inductively with older drivers.
Older drivers believed that it was important to consider confidence in their own abilities and discomfort caused by other drivers, to separate day and night driving, and to specify the driving context (eg, traffic flow, speed). Rasch analysis showed that the final 13-item DCS-D and 16-item DCS-N were both hierarchic and unidimensional, with good person (.89, .96) and item (.98, .97) reliabilities, respectively. Test-retest reliability was adequate for the DCS-D (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.7) and good for the DCS-N (ICC=.88). Scores were significantly associated with reported driving frequency, situational avoidance, and perceived abilities (P<.001).
The Driving Comfort Scales are promising new tools for research and practice.
从老年人的角度审视和衡量驾驶信心。
采用焦点小组进行结构审查、项目生成和评分;使用拉施分析进行心理测量测试以完善量表;检验重测信度以及与驾驶员特征和驾驶习惯的关联。
加拿大安大略省的退休社区、老年人住房和中心。
当前驾驶员的便利样本(n = 143)(年龄范围66 - 92岁)和7名顾问。
不适用。
与老年驾驶员归纳得出的日间(DCS - D)和夜间(DCS - N)驾驶舒适度量表。
老年驾驶员认为,重要的是要考虑对自身能力的信心以及其他驾驶员造成的不适,区分日间和夜间驾驶,并明确驾驶情境(如交通流量、速度)。拉施分析表明,最终的13项DCS - D和16项DCS - N量表均具有等级性和单维性,人员信度分别良好(.89,.96)和项目信度良好(.98,.97)。DCS - D的重测信度足够(组内相关系数[ICC]=.7),DCS - N的重测信度良好(ICC =.88)。得分与报告的驾驶频率、情境回避和感知能力显著相关(P<.001)。
驾驶舒适度量表是研究和实践中有前景的新工具。