Suppr超能文献

鼻胃管对误吸发生率的影响。

Effect of nasogastric tubes on incidence of aspiration.

作者信息

Leder Steven B, Suiter Debra M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8041, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):648-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.038.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine what effect, if any, a nasogastric (NG) tube has on occurrence of anterograde aspiration during objective evaluation of swallowing using both liquid and puree bolus consistencies.

DESIGN

Prospective, consecutive.

SETTING

Large, urban, tertiary care, teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Referred sample of 1260 consecutively enrolled inpatients. Group 1 (n=630; 346 male, 284 female) had an NG tube and group 2 (n=630; 360 male, 270 female) did not have an NG tube at time of referral for dysphagia evaluation.

INTERVENTION

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Aspiration status.

RESULTS

A Pearson chi-square indicated no significant differences (P>.05) for aspiration of either liquid or puree food consistencies dependent on presence of an NG tube. Separate binary logistic regression analyses were used to determine if the presence of an NG tube interacted with participants' age to affect the dependent variables of liquid and puree aspiration. There were no significant effects for liquid aspiration (odds ratio [OR]=1.004, P>.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.987-1.021) or puree aspiration (OR=0.992, P>.05; 95% CI, 0.971-1.014). In addition, no significant interactions (P>.05) were found between NG tube status and sex, age, or diagnostic category, and presence of an NG tube did not significantly increase the odds of either liquid aspiration (OR=1.092, P>.05; 95% CI, 0.842-1.418) or puree aspiration (OR=0.975, P>.05; 95% CI, 0.713-1.333). Last, subjects between 60 and 90 years of age, regardless of NG tube status, aspirated more frequently than younger subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were found regarding aspiration status for liquid or puree food consistencies between 2 separate but comparable groups, that is, one with and one without an NG tube, regardless of sex, age, or diagnostic category. Because objective swallowing evaluation, for example, FEES, can be performed with an NG tube in place, it is not necessary to remove an NG tube to evaluate dysphagia. Similarly, there is no contraindication to leaving an NG tube in place to supplement oral alimentation.

摘要

目的

确定在使用液体和泥状食物团块稠度对吞咽进行客观评估期间,鼻胃管(NG)是否对顺行性误吸的发生有影响(若有影响,确定其影响程度)。

设计

前瞻性、连续性研究。

地点

大型城市三级护理教学医院。

参与者

连续纳入的1260例转诊住院患者。第1组(n = 630;男性346例,女性284例)在因吞咽困难转诊时置有鼻胃管,第2组(n = 630;男性360例,女性270例)在因吞咽困难转诊时未置鼻胃管。

干预措施

纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)。

主要观察指标

误吸状态。

结果

Pearson卡方检验表明,无论是否存在鼻胃管,液体或泥状食物的误吸情况均无显著差异(P>0.05)。采用单独的二元逻辑回归分析来确定鼻胃管的存在是否与参与者的年龄相互作用,从而影响液体和泥状食物误吸的因变量。液体误吸方面无显著影响(优势比[OR]=1.004,P>0.05;95%置信区间[CI],0.987 - 1.021),泥状食物误吸方面也无显著影响(OR = 0.992,P>0.05;95% CI,0.971 - 1.014)。此外,在鼻胃管状态与性别、年龄或诊断类别之间未发现显著交互作用(P>0.05),且鼻胃管的存在并未显著增加液体误吸(OR = 1.092,P>0.05;95% CI,0.842 - 1.418)或泥状食物误吸(OR = 0.975,P>0.05;95% CI,0.713 - 1.333)的几率。最后,60至90岁的受试者,无论鼻胃管状态如何,误吸频率均高于年轻受试者。

结论

在两个独立但具有可比性的组之间,即置有鼻胃管组和未置鼻胃管组,无论性别、年龄或诊断类别如何,在液体或泥状食物的误吸状态方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。由于可以在置有鼻胃管的情况下进行客观的吞咽评估,例如FEES,因此无需拔除鼻胃管来评估吞咽困难。同样地,留置鼻胃管以补充经口营养也没有禁忌证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验