Kim Gowun, Baek Sora, Park Hee-Won, Kang Eun Kyoung, Lee Gyuhyun
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Baengnyeong-ro 156, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, South Korea.
Gangwon-do Rehabilitation Hospital, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Dysphagia. 2018 Dec;33(6):731-738. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9894-7. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Nasogastric tube (NGT) is a common feeding strategy for patients at risk of endotracheal aspiration with an oral diet. With NGT feeding, however, swallowing of small amounts saliva cannot be avoided. We investigated whether the aspiration rate when swallowing 1 mL of fluid increased in patients using an NGT in different dysphagia severities. One hundred forty-seven patients who had been receiving NGT feeding underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). During VFSS, subjects were offered 1 mL of fluid twice: initially, with the tube inserted (NGT-in) and, subsequently, with the tube removed (NGT-out). Aspiration depth was determined using the 8-point Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) (0 points, no aspiration/penetration; 8 points, aspiration passing the vocal cords with no ejection efforts). PAS-diff was computed (PAS - PAS), and a positive PAS-diff (PAS-diff > 0) meant increased aspiration depth in the presence of NGT. After VFSS, diet recommendations were made according to dysphagia severity assessment: non-oral feeding (n = 59), diet modification (n = 74), and diet as tolerated (n = 13). Cognitive level (mini-mental state examination, MMSE) and general functional level (Modified Barthel Index, MBI) were compared between the PAS-diff > 0 and PAS-diff ≤ 0 groups. Aspiration severity did not significantly change after NGT removal (PAS, 2.45 ± 2.40; PAS, 2.57 ± 2.58; P = .50). Regardless of recommended diet, PAS-diff values were not significantly different (P = .49). MMSE and MBI were not significantly different (P = .23 and .94) between subjects with PAS-diff > 0 (n = 25) and PAS-diff ≤ 0 (n = 121). In conclusion, the risk of aspirating a small amount of fluid was not significantly different before and after NGT removal, regardless of swallowing function, cognitive level, or general functional level.
鼻胃管(NGT)是有经口进食时气管内误吸风险患者的一种常用喂养策略。然而,采用NGT喂养时,少量唾液的吞咽无法避免。我们调查了不同吞咽困难严重程度的使用NGT的患者在吞咽1毫升液体时误吸率是否增加。147名接受NGT喂养的患者接受了视频荧光吞咽造影检查(VFSS)。在VFSS期间,受试者两次被给予1毫升液体:最初,鼻胃管插入时(NGT插入),随后,鼻胃管拔除时(NGT拔除)。使用8分的渗透-误吸量表(PAS)确定误吸深度(0分,无误吸/渗透;8分,误吸通过声带且无咳出动作)。计算PAS差值(PAS差值=PAS(NGT拔除)-PAS(NGT插入)),PAS差值为正(PAS差值>0)意味着在存在鼻胃管的情况下误吸深度增加。VFSS后,根据吞咽困难严重程度评估给出饮食建议:非经口喂养(n=59)、饮食调整(n=74)和耐受饮食(n=13)。比较PAS差值>0组和PAS差值≤0组的认知水平(简易精神状态检查表,MMSE)和一般功能水平(改良巴氏指数,MBI)。鼻胃管拔除后误吸严重程度无显著变化(PAS(NGT插入),2.45±2.40;PAS(NGT拔除),2.57±2.58;P=0.50)。无论推荐的饮食如何,PAS差值无显著差异(P=0.49)。PAS差值>0的受试者(n=25)和PAS差值≤0的受试者(n=121)之间的MMSE和MBI无显著差异(P=0.23和0.94)。总之,无论吞咽功能、认知水平或一般功能水平如何,鼻胃管拔除前后少量液体误吸的风险无显著差异。