Fantes J A, Boland E, Ramsay J, Donnai D, Splitt M, Goodship J A, Stewart H, Whiteford M, Gautier P, Harewood L, Holloway S, Sharkey F, Maher E, van Heyningen V, Clayton-Smith J, Fitzpatrick D R, Black G C M
Medical and Developmental Genetics Section, Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK.
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Apr;82(4):916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
We report fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of 152, mostly de novo, apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (ABCR) breakpoints in 76 individuals, 30 of whom had no obvious phenotypic abnormality (control group) and 46 of whom had an associated disease (case group). The aim of this study was to identify breakpoint characteristics that could discriminate between these groups and which might be of predictive value in de novo ABCR (DN-ABCR) cases detected antenatally. We found no difference in the proportion of breakpoints that interrupted a gene, although in three cases, direct interruption or deletion of known autosomal-dominant or X-linked recessive Mendelian disease genes was diagnostic. The only significant predictor of phenotypic abnormality in the group as a whole was the localization of one or both breakpoints to an R-positive (G-negative) band with estimated predictive values of 0.69 (95% CL 0.54-0.81) and 0.90 (95% CL 0.60-0.98), respectively. R-positive bands are known to contain more genes and have a higher guanine-cytosine (GC) content than do G-positive (R-negative) bands; however, whether a gene was interrupted by the breakpoint or the GC content in the 200 kB around the breakpoint had no discriminant ability. Our results suggest that the large-scale genomic context of the breakpoint has prognostic utility and that the pathological mechanism of mapping to an R-band cannot be accounted for by direct gene inactivation.
我们报告了对76名个体中152个(大多为新发)明显平衡的染色体重排(ABCR)断点进行的荧光原位杂交(FISH)定位,其中30人无明显表型异常(对照组),46人患有相关疾病(病例组)。本研究的目的是确定能够区分这两组的断点特征,这些特征可能对产前检测到的新发ABCR(DN-ABCR)病例具有预测价值。我们发现打断基因的断点比例没有差异,尽管在三个病例中,已知常染色体显性或X连锁隐性孟德尔疾病基因的直接打断或缺失具有诊断意义。在整个组中,表型异常的唯一显著预测因素是一个或两个断点定位于R阳性(G阴性)带,估计预测值分别为0.69(95%可信区间0.54 - 0.81)和0.90(95%可信区间0.60 - 0.98)。已知R阳性带比G阳性(R阴性)带含有更多基因且鸟嘌呤 - 胞嘧啶(GC)含量更高;然而,断点是否打断基因或断点周围200 kB内的GC含量没有判别能力。我们的结果表明,断点的大规模基因组背景具有预后价值,并且定位到R带的病理机制不能用直接基因失活来解释。