Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌放疗后的第二原发性癌症——近距离放射治疗与外照射放疗的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析

Second primary cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer--a seer analysis of brachytherapy versus external beam radiotherapy.

作者信息

Abdel-Wahab May, Reis Isildinha M, Hamilton Kara

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.043. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of second primary cancers (SPCs) and radiotherapy-induced SPCs (RTSPCs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The incidence of SPCs and RTSPCs was compared among four treatment groups with locoregional prostate adenocarcinoma in the 1973-2002 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. These groups were no radiotherapy (RT), no surgery (Group 1); external beam RT (EBRT) (Group 2); brachytherapy (Group 3); and a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy (Group 4).

RESULTS

The age-adjusted estimates of SPCs were greater with EBRT than with brachytherapy (2,178 vs. 1,901 SPCs/100,000; p = 0.025) or with the no RT, no surgery group (1,971 SPCs/100,000; p <0.0001). The age-adjusted rate of late SPC (>or=5 years) for EBRT (2,425 SPCs/100,000) was only significantly greater (p <0.0001) than that for no RT, no surgery (1,950 SPCs/100,000). The hazard ratio adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and grade was constant at 1.263 for EBRT compared with no RT, no surgery (p <0.0001) but varied with the length of follow-up in both the brachytherapy (0.721 at 5 years to 1.200 at 9 years) and combination (0.920 at 5 years to 1.317 at 9 years) groups. The incidence of RTSPCs was only significantly different between the no RT, no surgery group and the EBRT group, with an increase of 162 cases/100,000 or a 0.16% increased SPC risk (p = 0.023). No significant differences in the incidence of RTSPC were seen between the RT groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were seen in the incidence of RTSPCs between the RT groups. The initial smaller relative risk of overall SPCs in the brachytherapy group increased with time until the curves converged, suggesting that the effect had resulted from patient selection bias.

摘要

目的

确定第二原发性癌症(SPC)和放射治疗诱发的第二原发性癌症(RTSPC)的发病率。

患者与方法

在1973 - 2002年监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中,比较了四个局部前列腺腺癌治疗组中SPC和RTSPC的发病率。这四个组分别是:未接受放疗(RT)、未接受手术(第1组);外照射放疗(EBRT)(第2组);近距离放射治疗(第3组);EBRT与近距离放射治疗联合(第4组)。

结果

EBRT组年龄调整后的SPC估计值高于近距离放射治疗组(每100,000人中有2,178例SPC对1,901例;p = 0.025)或未接受放疗、未接受手术组(每100,000人中有1,971例SPC;p <0.0001)。EBRT组晚期SPC(≥5年)的年龄调整发病率(每100,000人中有2,425例SPC)仅显著高于未接受放疗、未接受手术组(每100,000人中有1,950例;p <0.0001)。与未接受放疗、未接受手术组相比,EBRT组经年龄、种族/族裔和分级调整后的风险比恒定为1.263(p <0.0001),但在近距离放射治疗组(5年时为0.721,9年时为1.200)和联合治疗组(5年时为0.920,9年时为1.317)中均随随访时间而变化。RTSPC的发病率仅在未接受放疗、未接受手术组与EBRT组之间存在显著差异,增加了162例/100,000,即SPC风险增加了0.16%(p = 0.023)。放疗组之间RTSPC的发病率未见显著差异。

结论

放疗组之间RTSPC的发病率未见显著差异。近距离放射治疗组总体SPC最初相对风险较小,但随时间增加直至曲线趋于一致,提示该效应是由患者选择偏倚导致的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验