Trisolini Rocco, Tinelli Carmine, Cancellieri Alessandra, Paioli Daniela, Alifano Marco, Boaron Maurizio, Patelli Marco
Unit of Thoracic Endoscopy and Pulmonology, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Apr;135(4):837-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.011.
Transbronchial needle aspiration is a useful diagnostic procedure in sarcoidosis, but widely variable yields are reported. This study determined the diagnostic contribution of standard transbronchial needle aspiration in a large series of patients with sarcoidosis and evaluated predictor variables that might influence its results.
Sixty-one consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis in a 2-year period were prospectively enrolled and underwent standard transbronchial needle aspiration with a 19-gauge needle. The following predictor variables were recorded for each patient: age; sex; sarcoidosis stage; operator; size, location, and number of sampled lymph nodes; number of needle passes per sampled node; and adequacy of both histologic and cytologic transbronchial needle aspiration specimens.
Sarcoidosis was diagnosed in 53 patients. Lymph node aspiration biopsy was successfully achieved in 50 of 53 cases (94%). Nonnecrotizing epithelioid granulomas were observed in 42 of 53 patients (79%), with similar results for stage I (27/33, 82%) and stage II (15/20, 75%) disease. Sampling of two lymph node stations was the only variable significantly associated with a likelihood of a sarcoidosis-positive aspirate or biopsy sample in both univariate (odds ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.79) and multivariate (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.70) analyses.
Standard transbronchial needle aspiration allows successful lymph node sampling in nearly all patients with sarcoidosis and is associated with high diagnostic yield regardless of disease stage. Whenever possible, sampling of more than one nodal station is advised to increase diagnostic yield. Mediastinoscopy should be reserved for patients with negative transbronchial needle aspiration findings.
经支气管针吸活检术在结节病诊断中是一种有用的诊断方法,但报道的活检阳性率差异很大。本研究确定了标准经支气管针吸活检术对大量结节病患者的诊断贡献,并评估了可能影响其结果的预测变量。
前瞻性纳入61例在2年期间疑似结节病的连续患者,并使用19号针进行标准经支气管针吸活检术。记录每位患者的以下预测变量:年龄;性别;结节病分期;操作者;取样淋巴结的大小、位置和数量;每个取样淋巴结的穿刺针数;以及经支气管针吸活检组织学和细胞学标本的充足性。
53例患者确诊为结节病。53例中有50例(94%)成功进行了淋巴结针吸活检。53例患者中有42例(79%)观察到非坏死性上皮样肉芽肿,I期(27/33,82%)和II期(15/20,75%)疾病的结果相似。在单因素(比值比0.15,95%置信区间0.02 - 0.79)和多因素(比值比0.12,95%置信区间0.02 - 0.70)分析中,对两个淋巴结站进行取样是与结节病针吸活检阳性可能性显著相关的唯一变量。
标准经支气管针吸活检术几乎能使所有结节病患者成功进行淋巴结取样,且无论疾病分期,诊断阳性率都很高。建议尽可能对多个淋巴结站进行取样以提高诊断阳性率。对于经支气管针吸活检结果阴性的患者,应保留纵隔镜检查。