Olmo Jesús, Jato Susana, Benito Jaime, Martín Ignacio, Dvir Zeevi
Department of Rehabilitation and Functional Evaluation, Fraternidad Muprespa Central Hospital, Madre de Dios 42, 28016 Madrid, Spain.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Oct;19(5):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
Based on the limited ability of the human being to voluntarily control submaximal eccentric exertions, previous studies have indicated that isokinetic testing with a combined concentric-eccentric exercise protocol could effectively identify submaximal (feigned) effort in various muscle groups by showing an abnormally high eccentric to concentric ratio (ECR). The objective of this study was to determine the validity and accuracy of an ECR-based isokinetic test in identifying feigned ankle weakness. Thirty-eight normal subjects performed maximal and feigned efforts in an isokinetic concentric and eccentric ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion protocol with two different velocities, 30 and 120 degrees s(-1). The isokinetic parameters ECR and the derivatives DEC (difference between ECR at high speed of motion and ECR at low speed of motion) and SEC (sum of ECR at high speed of motion plus the ratio between eccentric peak torque at high speed and concentric peak torque at low speed) were calculated. The ECR, DEC and SEC scores were significantly greater in feigned conditions for ankle plantarflexion, but not for dorsiflexion. Using optimal cutoff scores based on 99% tolerance intervals, it was disclosed that the most efficient parameter was the SEC, identifying 92% of the feigned efforts with 99% confidence, indicating that the ankle plantarflexors are less controllable in fast eccentric conditions than that in concentric conditions. The ECR-based parameters are valid for effectively identifying feigned plantarflexion effort with high accuracy, but do not allow the detection of feigned dorsiflexion weakness.
基于人类自主控制次最大离心运动的能力有限,先前的研究表明,采用同心-离心联合运动方案的等速测试可以通过显示异常高的离心与同心比率(ECR),有效地识别各个肌肉群的次最大(假装的)用力情况。本研究的目的是确定基于ECR的等速测试在识别假装的踝关节无力方面的有效性和准确性。38名正常受试者在等速同心和离心踝关节跖屈和背屈方案中,以30和120度/秒两种不同速度进行最大用力和假装用力。计算了等速参数ECR以及导数DEC(运动高速时的ECR与运动低速时的ECR之差)和SEC(运动高速时的ECR加上高速离心峰值扭矩与低速同心峰值扭矩之比)。在假装用力条件下,踝关节跖屈的ECR、DEC和SEC得分显著更高,但背屈则不然。使用基于99%耐受区间的最佳截断分数,发现最有效的参数是SEC,以99%的置信度识别出92%的假装用力情况,这表明在快速离心条件下,踝关节跖屈肌比在同心条件下更难控制。基于ECR的参数对于有效且高精度地识别假装的跖屈用力是有效的,但无法检测出假装的背屈无力。