• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层随机胜者优先规则。

Stratified and randomized play-the-winner rule.

作者信息

Liang Yuanyuan, Carriere Kimmie Chough

机构信息

Alberta Research Centre for Child Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Dec;17(6):581-93. doi: 10.1177/0962280207081606. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1177/0962280207081606
PMID:18375460
Abstract

In this paper, a new allocation rule for treatment assignments in sequential clinical trials is proposed. The stratified and randomized play-the-winner rule (SRPWR) is an extension of the randomized play-the-winner rule to more than two treatments. It is applicable to cases where the probabilities of success of a treatment depend on both treatments and known confounders (e.g., patient's age, gender and disease status). On average, demonstrate that the SRPWR assigns more patients to the better treatment, while eliminating the selection bias and allowing delayed responses to treatments.

摘要

本文提出了一种用于序贯临床试验中治疗分配的新分配规则。分层随机胜者优先规则(SRPWR)是随机胜者优先规则向两种以上治疗的扩展。它适用于治疗成功概率取决于治疗方法和已知混杂因素(如患者年龄、性别和疾病状态)的情况。平均而言,证明SRPWR将更多患者分配到更好的治疗组,同时消除选择偏倚并允许对治疗有延迟反应。

相似文献

1
Stratified and randomized play-the-winner rule.分层随机胜者优先规则。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Dec;17(6):581-93. doi: 10.1177/0962280207081606. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
2
Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.在无法设盲的小分层中进行适应性偏倚瓮随机化。
Biometrics. 1995 Dec;51(4):1529-35.
3
Dynamic treatment allocation adjusting for prognostic factors for more than two treatments.
Biometrics. 1995 Dec;51(4):1338-43.
4
Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.随机胜者优先规则的功效和样本量模拟
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jul;28(4):487-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
5
Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.具有方差惩罚准则的响应自适应设计。
Biom J. 2009 Oct;51(5):763-73. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200800233.
6
Five interval estimators for proportion ratio under a stratified randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.在存在不依从性的分层随机临床试验中比例比的五种区间估计量。
Biom J. 2007 Aug;49(4):613-26. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200510287.
7
A comparison of conditional and unconditional randomization tests for highly stratified designs.高度分层设计的条件随机化检验与无条件随机化检验的比较。
Biometrics. 1998 Dec;54(4):1551-9.
8
A covariate adjusted two-stage allocation design for binary responses in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中二元反应的协变量调整两阶段分配设计。
Stat Med. 2007 Oct 30;26(24):4386-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.2869.
9
A multiple-step selection procedure with sequential protection of preferred treatments.
Biometrics. 1993 Sep;49(3):753-61.
10
Frequentist evaluation of group sequential clinical trial designs.成组序贯临床试验设计的频率学派评估
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 10;26(28):5047-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.2901.