传统关节造影术在创伤后尺侧腕部疼痛检查中的诊断价值：MRI和磁共振关节造影术是否总是必要的？
Diagnostic value of conventional arthrography in investigating post-traumatic ulnar wrist pain: are MRI and MR arthrography always necessary?
作者信息
Kazakos Konstantinos J, Xarchas Konstantinos C, Ziogas Miltiades K, Kehagias Dimitrios J, Verettas Dionysios A
机构信息
Department of Orthopedics, Democritus University of Thrace Medical School, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
出版信息
Med Sci Monit. 2008 Apr;14(4):CS37-40.
BACKGROUND
Ulnar wrist pain is a difficult problem to diagnose and treat. Many diagnostic methods can be used, each having its own value, but the surgeon should know which is the simplest and most appropriate for each case.
CASE REPORT
Such a case, investigated adequately by conventional arthrography is presented. A review of the relevant literature and a discussion of whether conventional MR and MR arthrography are always necessary or not is provided.
CONCLUSIONS
MR arthrography does not need be performed in every case of ulnar wrist pain, this depending on the findings of conventional arthrography, an opinion that has also been confirmed by the authors' own previous experience.
背景
尺侧腕部疼痛是一个难以诊断和治疗的问题。可采用多种诊断方法，每种方法都有其自身价值，但外科医生应了解哪种方法对每个病例来说是最简单且最合适的。
病例报告
本文呈现了这样一个通过传统关节造影进行充分检查的病例。同时对相关文献进行了综述，并讨论了传统磁共振成像（MR）和磁共振关节造影是否总是必要的问题。
结论
并非每个尺侧腕部疼痛病例都需要进行磁共振关节造影，这取决于传统关节造影的结果，作者自己先前的经验也证实了这一观点。
Zotero 插件