Zyskind D, Frenkel A, Fuks A, Hirschfeld Z
Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Quintessence Int. 1991 Jan;22(1):41-5.
The object of this investigation was to assess the degree of marginal leakage around V-shaped cervical glass-ionomer cement restorations and compare it to that around composite resin restorations. Three different glass-ionomer cements and one composite resin control were assessed by means of dye penetration. Severe microleakage at the occlusal margins was found in 70% of the glass-ionomer cement restorations, but in only 10% of the composite resin restorations. A considerable amount of dye penetration was observed at the cervical margins of all restorations, including the controls. None of the glass-ionomer cements tested showed superiority in preventing marginal leakage occlusally or gingivally.
本研究的目的是评估V形颈部玻璃离子水门汀修复体周围的边缘渗漏程度,并将其与复合树脂修复体周围的边缘渗漏程度进行比较。通过染料渗透法对三种不同的玻璃离子水门汀和一种复合树脂对照材料进行了评估。结果发现,70%的玻璃离子水门汀修复体在咬合边缘存在严重的微渗漏,而复合树脂修复体中只有10%存在这种情况。在所有修复体(包括对照材料)的颈部边缘均观察到大量染料渗透。所测试的玻璃离子水门汀在防止咬合或牙龈边缘渗漏方面均未显示出优势。