Brown Richard J C, Hood Daniel, Brown Andrew S
Analytical Science Team, Quality of life Division, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, UK.
J Autom Methods Manag Chem. 2008;2008:814715. doi: 10.1155/2008/814715.
No measurement result of any kind is complete without an associated statement of uncertainty. In general, the aim is to minimise this measurement uncertainty to the extent that the measurement made is fit for purpose, or the uncertainty meets an acceptable level such as a "data quality objective". This paper demonstrates how the sampling time used to measure a pollutant in ambient air over a given time period, particularly with automatic instruments, can affect the uncertainty of the measurement result. It is shown that the uncertainty of the overall result depends critically on how the precision characteristics of the measuring instrumentation vary with analyte abundance. An example of the determination of these characteristics for mercury vapour measurement and the conclusions that may be drawn about optimum sampling times to minimise uncertainty are presented. For situations where uncertainty is minimised by the use of long sampling periods, the implications of this strategy on the "information richness" of the data and on the detection of short-term episodes, as well as peak concentrations, are discussed.
任何测量结果如果没有相关的不确定度声明都是不完整的。一般来说,目标是将这种测量不确定度降至最低,使所进行的测量符合目的,或者不确定度达到可接受的水平,如“数据质量目标”。本文展示了在给定时间段内用于测量环境空气中污染物的采样时间,特别是使用自动仪器时,如何影响测量结果的不确定度。结果表明,总体结果的不确定度关键取决于测量仪器的精度特性如何随分析物丰度变化。给出了汞蒸气测量中这些特性的测定示例以及关于使不确定度最小化的最佳采样时间可得出的结论。对于通过使用长采样周期使不确定度最小化的情况,讨论了该策略对数据“信息丰富度”以及短期事件和峰值浓度检测的影响。