Banauch Gisela I, Izbicki Gabriel, Christodoulou Vasilios, Weiden Michael D, Webber Mayris P, Cohen Hillel, Gustave Jackson, Chavko Robert, Aldrich Thomas K, Kelly Kerry J, Prezant David J
Pulmonary Division, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Mar;2(1):33-9. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318164ee0c.
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory treatment for asthmatics. This trial evaluated the effects of prophylactic ICS in firefighters exposed to the World Trade Center disaster.
Inhaled budesonide via a dry powder inhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) was offered on-site to New York City firefighters between September 18 and 25, 2001. One to 2 years later, firefighters (n = 64) who completed 4 weeks of daily ICS treatment were evaluated and compared with an age- and exposure-matched comparison group (n = 72) who did not use ICS.
When spirometry results at the final visit were compared with those from the weeks following the 9/11 disaster, the treatment group had a greater increase in forced vital capacity (P = .009) and possibly a slower decline in forced expiratory volume at 1 second (P = .11), as well as a greater improvement in perceived well-being as assessed by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (P < .01). There was no difference in airway hyperreactivity and no evidence of adverse effects from ICS.
Because the potential for hazardous exposures is great at many disasters, disease prevention programs based on environmental controls and respiratory protection are warranted immediately. Our results suggest that, pending further study with a larger sample, prophylactic ICS should be considered, along with respiratory protection, to minimize possible lung insult.
吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)是治疗哮喘最有效的抗炎药物。本试验评估了预防性使用ICS对暴露于世贸中心灾难的消防员的影响。
2001年9月18日至25日,在现场为纽约市消防员提供通过干粉吸入器(普米克都保,阿斯利康公司,特拉华州威尔明顿)吸入的布地奈德。1至2年后,对完成4周每日ICS治疗的64名消防员进行评估,并与未使用ICS的年龄和暴露情况相匹配的对照组(72名)进行比较。
将末次访视时的肺功能测定结果与9·11灾难后数周的结果进行比较时,治疗组的用力肺活量增加幅度更大(P = 0.009),1秒用力呼气量下降可能更慢(P = 0.11);根据圣乔治呼吸问卷评估,治疗组的健康感知改善也更大(P < 0.01)。两组的气道高反应性无差异,但没有证据表明ICS存在不良反应。
由于在许多灾难中发生有害暴露的可能性很大,因此应立即实施基于环境控制和呼吸防护的疾病预防计划。我们的结果表明,在进行更大样本的进一步研究之前,应考虑预防性使用ICS并结合呼吸防护,以尽量减少可能的肺部损伤。