Veraldi Gian Franco, Minicozzi Annamaria, Genco Bruno, Tasselli Sebastiano, Pacca Rosario, Segattini Christian
Universita degli Studi di Verona, II Scuola di Specializzazione in Chirurgia Generale, I Divisione Clinicizzata di Chirurgia Generale, Struttura Semplice Organizzativa di Chirurgia Vascolare, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona.
Chir Ital. 2008 Jan-Feb;60(1):23-31.
The association between abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and cancer is becoming more and more frequent, giving rise to several questions regarding the therapeutic and surgical management strategies for both diseases. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the treatment of choice for complex and high-risk patients. In this study we reviewed our experience with patients concomitantly affected by any type of cancer and AAA treated by EVAR at our institution over the last six years. From April 2001 to July 2007, 497 AAA patients underwent open or endografting repair in the 1st Division of General Surgery--Service of Vascular Surgery of the University of Verona. In 53 cases (10.6%) an association with a solid neoplasm was found and 27 of these patients (50.9%) were treated by EVAR. Twenty patients underwent a two-stage approach, with EVAR performed first, while in 5 cases a one-stage approach was preferred on the basis of the general condition of the patients, the site of the tumour to be resected, the logistic possibilities and increased experience of the operators with EVAR. Two patients received chemotherapy after EVAR. There was no in-hospital mortality and four perioperative complications (14.8%) were registered. During a mean follow-up of 25.7 months (range: 2-64 months) 5 deaths occurred, 2 in the short term and 3 in the long term, none of which were related to AAA treatment. Three type-2 endoleaks occurred that sealed spontaneously and 62.9% of the treated aneurysms had a mean 20% decrease in diameter while the others presented no variations. In our experience, EVAR was a safe and effective treatment of AAA patients with concomitant malignancies with a relatively low procedure-related morbidity and no mortality. A simultaneous surgical approach can be achieved safely, performing EVAR as the first step without significant risks. Simultaneous treatment has the advantage of avoiding a second major procedure and eliminates the risk of aortic aneurysm rupture in the postoperative period or during chemotherapy in patients who are usually in poor general condition. Care must be taken with regard to the choice of the device to be used and the possible vascular complications of the visceral circulation. In our opinion, EVAR should be considered the treatment of choice in these patients, taking into account, however, that this treatment is not always feasible in all cases and that in patients with a normal life-expectancy (tumour-cured) it may not always be the right choice. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary in the individual evaluation of these challenging patients in order to make the right decisions.
腹主动脉瘤(AAA)与癌症之间的关联日益常见,引发了关于这两种疾病治疗及手术管理策略的诸多问题。血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)是复杂及高危患者的首选治疗方法。在本研究中,我们回顾了过去六年里在我院接受EVAR治疗的同时患有任何类型癌症及AAA的患者的治疗经验。2001年4月至2007年7月,497例AAA患者在维罗纳大学普通外科第一科室——血管外科接受了开放手术或腔内修复术。其中53例(10.6%)发现合并实体肿瘤,这些患者中有27例(50.9%)接受了EVAR治疗。20例患者采用两阶段手术方法,先进行EVAR,而5例患者根据患者一般状况、待切除肿瘤部位、后勤保障可能性以及术者对EVAR操作经验的增加,优先采用了一阶段手术方法。2例患者在EVAR术后接受了化疗。无住院死亡病例,记录到4例围手术期并发症(14.8%)。在平均25.7个月(范围:2 - 64个月)的随访期内,发生了5例死亡,2例为短期死亡,3例为长期死亡,均与AAA治疗无关。发生了3例2型内漏,均自行封闭,62.9%的治疗动脉瘤直径平均缩小了20%,其余动脉瘤无变化。根据我们的经验,EVAR是治疗合并恶性肿瘤的AAA患者的一种安全有效的方法,并具有相对较低的手术相关发病率且无死亡率。可以安全地实现同步手术方法,将EVAR作为第一步进行,且无重大风险。同步治疗的优点是避免了二次大手术,并消除了通常全身状况较差的患者在术后或化疗期间发生主动脉瘤破裂的风险。在选择使用的器械以及内脏循环可能出现的血管并发症方面必须谨慎。我们认为,在这些患者中应考虑将EVAR作为首选治疗方法,然而,应考虑到这种治疗并非在所有情况下都可行,并且对于预期寿命正常(肿瘤已治愈)的患者,它可能并不总是正确的选择。因此,对于这些具有挑战性的患者进行个体化评估时,需要多学科方法以便做出正确决策。