Danese Andrea, Moffitt Terrie E, Pariante Carmine M, Ambler Antony, Poulton Richie, Caspi Avshalom
Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, PO Box 080, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, England.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;65(4):409-15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.4.409.
The association between depression and inflammation is inconsistent across research samples.
To test whether a history of childhood maltreatment could identify a subgroup of depressed individuals with elevated inflammation levels, thus helping to explain previous inconsistencies.
Prospective longitudinal cohort study.
New Zealand.
A representative birth cohort of 1000 individuals was followed up to age 32 years as part of the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Study members were assessed for history of childhood maltreatment and current depression.
Inflammation was assessed using a clinically relevant categorical measure of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (>3 mg/L) and a dimensional inflammation factor indexing the shared variance of continuous measures of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and white blood cells.
Although depression was associated with high levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (relative risk,1.45; 95% confidence interval,1.06-1.99), this association was significantly attenuated and no longer significant when the effect of childhood maltreatment was taken into account. Individuals with current depression and a history of childhood maltreatment were more likely to have high levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein compared with control subjects (n = 27; relative risk, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.47). In contrast, individuals with current depression only had a nonsignificant elevation in risk (n = 109; relative risk, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.01). Results were generalizable to the inflammation factor. The elevated inflammation levels in individuals who were both depressed and maltreated were not explained by correlated risk factors such as depression recurrence, low socioeconomic status in childhood or adulthood, poor health, or smoking.
A history of childhood maltreatment contributes to the co-occurrence of depression and inflammation. Information about experiences of childhood maltreatment may help to identify depressed individuals with elevated inflammation levels and, thus, at greater risk of cardiovascular disease.
抑郁症与炎症之间的关联在不同研究样本中并不一致。
检验童年期受虐史是否能识别出炎症水平升高的抑郁症患者亚组,从而有助于解释先前研究结果的不一致性。
前瞻性纵向队列研究。
新西兰。
作为达尼丁多学科健康与发展研究的一部分,对1000名具有代表性的出生队列个体进行随访,直至其32岁。研究成员接受了童年期受虐史和当前抑郁症的评估。
使用临床相关的高敏C反应蛋白分类测量法(>3mg/L)和一个炎症因子维度来评估炎症,该炎症因子对高敏C反应蛋白、纤维蛋白原和白细胞的连续测量值的共同方差进行索引。
尽管抑郁症与高敏C反应蛋白水平升高有关(相对风险为1.45;95%置信区间为1.06 - 1.99),但在考虑童年期受虐的影响后,这种关联显著减弱且不再显著。与对照组相比(n = 27;相对风险为2.07;95%置信区间为1.23 - 3.47),有当前抑郁症且有童年期受虐史的个体更有可能具有高水平的高敏C反应蛋白。相比之下,仅患有当前抑郁症的个体风险升高不显著(n = 109;相对风险为1.40;95%置信区间为0.97 - 2.01)。结果适用于炎症因子。抑郁且受虐个体炎症水平升高不能用抑郁复发风险、童年或成年期低社会经济地位、健康状况差或吸烟等相关风险因素来解释。
童年期受虐史促成了抑郁症与炎症的共同发生。有关童年期受虐经历的信息可能有助于识别炎症水平升高的抑郁症患者,从而这些患者患心血管疾病的风险更高。