Möller Mecker G, Lewis James M, Dessureault Sophie, Zager Jonathan S
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa. FL 33612, USA.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2008 May;24(3):275-89. doi: 10.1080/02656730701805520.
Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) and isolated limb infusion (ILI) may play a significant role in the treatment of patients with recurrent or in transit extremity melanoma or sarcoma that is unresectable. These procedures may be indicated when patients are otherwise faced with the possibility of a debilitating amputation. Not entirely benign treatment modalities, HILP and ILI can be associated with regional and systemic toxicities. We conducted a literature search of published studies using HILP and ILI for the treatment of extremity sarcomas and melanomas, and associated toxicities was performed. The regional toxicities of HILP and ILI are similar. The most common toxicities reported are mild to moderate. However, when severe regional toxicity occurs, albeit infrequently (<5%), fasciotomies or even amputation may be necessary. Some studies have showed a relationship between acute regional toxicities and long term regional morbidity. Systemic toxicity appears to be more frequent when TNF-alpha is used in combination with other drugs during HILP, however the use of TNF-alpha in the United States is limited to trials. Although regional toxicities are similar, systemic toxicity of ILI is minimal compared to HILP. ILI is easier to repeat, technically less complex, and may be more acceptable in infirmed patients. Long term morbidity and outcomes for ILI are still being evaluated. Both of these techniques may be suitable options in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent, or in transit extremity melanoma or sarcoma.
热灌注隔离肢体(HILP)和隔离肢体灌注(ILI)在治疗无法切除的复发性或转移性肢体黑色素瘤或肉瘤患者中可能发挥重要作用。当患者面临致残性截肢的可能性时,可考虑采用这些治疗方法。HILP和ILI并非完全无害的治疗方式,可能会伴有局部和全身毒性。我们对已发表的使用HILP和ILI治疗肢体肉瘤和黑色素瘤的研究进行了文献检索,并分析了相关毒性。HILP和ILI的局部毒性相似。报告的最常见毒性为轻至中度。然而,当发生严重的局部毒性时,尽管发生率较低(<5%),可能需要进行筋膜切开术甚至截肢。一些研究表明急性局部毒性与长期局部并发症之间存在关联。在HILP期间,当肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)与其他药物联合使用时,全身毒性似乎更常见,然而TNF-α在美国仅限于试验使用。尽管局部毒性相似,但与HILP相比,ILI的全身毒性最小。ILI更容易重复进行,技术上不太复杂,对于身体虚弱的患者可能更容易接受。ILI的长期并发症和疗效仍在评估中。对于无法切除的晚期或复发性、或转移性肢体黑色素瘤或肉瘤患者,这两种技术可能都是合适的选择。