Enriquez Mario, Maclean Karon E
Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, 201-2366 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 1Z4.
Brain Res Bull. 2008 Apr 15;75(6):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.018. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
To inform the design of haptic information displays for noisy environments, we investigated two mechanisms for temporal masking of vibrotactile stimuli (backwards and common-onset) using a commodity display. We used a two-channel setup, presenting stimuli to the middle and ring finger of a participant's right hand. The stimuli consisted of 250 Hz sinusoidal waveforms displayed at a fixed amplitude in various combinations of duration (0, 30 or 300 ms) and stimulus onset asynchrony (0 or 30 ms). In anticipation of future embedded applications where signals are deliberately masked but levels cannot be individualized, signals were standardized at conservative (harder to mask) levels. Our results confirm the existence of a statistically significant masking effect for both forms of haptic masking explored, with common-onset exhibiting a significantly larger masking effect than backwards. However, an analysis of confidence in response levels shows no difference between the two successful masking techniques. We discuss mechanisms that could be responsible for these results, which have implications for the design of user interfaces that rely on tactile transmission of information.
为了指导嘈杂环境下触觉信息显示器的设计,我们使用一款商用显示器研究了两种振动触觉刺激的时间掩蔽机制(反向掩蔽和共同起始掩蔽)。我们采用双通道设置,向参与者右手的中指和无名指施加刺激。刺激由250赫兹的正弦波形组成,以固定振幅呈现,持续时间(0、30或300毫秒)和刺激起始异步性(0或30毫秒)有各种组合。考虑到未来在嵌入式应用中信号会被故意掩蔽但强度无法个体化的情况,信号在保守(更难掩蔽)强度水平上进行了标准化。我们的结果证实了所探讨的两种触觉掩蔽形式均存在统计学上显著的掩蔽效应,共同起始掩蔽的掩蔽效应显著大于反向掩蔽。然而,对反应水平置信度的分析表明,这两种成功的掩蔽技术之间没有差异。我们讨论了可能导致这些结果的机制,这些机制对依赖触觉信息传递的用户界面设计具有启示意义。