Kekoni J, Tikkala I, Pertovaara A, Hämäläinen H
Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Somatosens Mot Res. 1990;7(4):353-63. doi: 10.3109/08990229009144713.
It was recently shown that the cutaneous sensitivity to airpuffs is decreased by a low-frequency vibrotactile masker in the hairy skin, and by a low-frequency but especially by a high-frequency masker in the glabrous skin. In the current study, the spatial features of this masking effect were determined in four healthy human subjects, using a reaction time paradigm. The masking effect decreased monotonically with increasing interstimulus distance, and identically in longitudinal and transverse (i.e., lateral) directions in the palm or dorsal surface of the hand. The masking effect was stronger in the glabrous than in the hairy skin, especially in the fingers. In the glabrous skin, the spread of masking effect produced by a high-frequency masker was more extensive than that produced by a low-frequency masker. The mechanical spread of high-frequency vibration was less extensive than that of low-frequency vibration in the skin. In the glabrous skin, a masker applied to the tip of the finger produced a stronger masking effect on sensations in the base of the finger than when the masker was located at the base and the test stimulus was located at the tip. It is concluded that mechanical spread of vibration in the skin is of minor importance in explaining the masking effects. Different peripheral neural mechanisms underlie the airpuff-elicited sensations in the hairy and glabrous skin. The afferent inhibitory mechanisms are stronger for signals coming from the glabrous skin of the fingers than for signals coming from the hairy skin. Furthermore, the peripheral innervation density and size of the cortical representational areas may be of importance in determining the magnitude of the masking effect.
最近的研究表明,在有毛皮肤中,低频振动掩蔽器会降低皮肤对气吹刺激的敏感性;在无毛皮肤中,低频掩蔽器会降低这种敏感性,而高频掩蔽器的效果尤为明显。在本研究中,采用反应时范式,在四名健康人类受试者中确定了这种掩蔽效应的空间特征。掩蔽效应随着刺激间隔距离的增加而单调下降,在手的掌面或背面,纵向和横向(即侧向)的下降情况相同。无毛皮肤中的掩蔽效应比有毛皮肤中的更强,尤其是在手指部位。在无毛皮肤中,高频掩蔽器产生的掩蔽效应传播范围比低频掩蔽器产生的更广泛。高频振动在皮肤中的机械传播范围比低频振动的更小。在无毛皮肤中,将掩蔽器施加于手指尖时,对手指基部的感觉产生的掩蔽效应,比将掩蔽器置于基部而测试刺激位于指尖时更强。研究得出结论,皮肤中振动的机械传播在解释掩蔽效应方面的重要性较小。有毛皮肤和无毛皮肤中,气吹引发的感觉有不同的外周神经机制。来自手指无毛皮肤的信号的传入抑制机制,比来自有毛皮肤的信号更强。此外,外周神经支配密度和皮质代表区的大小,可能在决定掩蔽效应的程度方面具有重要作用。