Stylianos Steven, Ford Henri R
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida 33155, USA.
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 May;17(2):110-5. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.02.006.
Variation in clinical practice patterns has attracted the attention of specialty organizations, payers, government health agencies, and the public. Such variation raises concerns about efficacy and cost relative to the care provided. Consequently, the establishment of national benchmarks has become an increasing priority in trauma care as well as elsewhere in the health sector. Comparing treatment of pediatric injury by hospital type or physician expertise has often created more controversy than conformity. Three key components that help define quality of care include infrastructure, process, and outcome. This report will highlight outcomes studies in pediatric trauma care, often comparing outcomes by physician and hospital expertise. We will discuss pediatric trauma mortality and outcomes in abdominal, closed head, and orthopedic injuries with an emphasis on functional outcomes. Much of the data are derived from large regional and national databases, which are increasingly available and useful in the analysis of specific aspects of our health care delivery system.
临床实践模式的差异已引起专业组织、支付方、政府卫生机构和公众的关注。这种差异引发了人们对所提供护理的疗效和成本的担忧。因此,在创伤护理以及卫生部门的其他领域,制定全国性基准已变得越来越重要。比较不同医院类型或医生专业知识对儿科损伤的治疗,往往引发的争议多于一致性。有助于界定护理质量的三个关键要素包括基础设施、过程和结果。本报告将重点介绍儿科创伤护理的结果研究,通常会比较医生和医院专业知识方面的结果。我们将讨论儿科创伤死亡率以及腹部、闭合性头部和骨科损伤的结果,重点关注功能结果。许多数据来自大型区域和国家数据库,这些数据库在分析我们医疗保健系统的特定方面越来越有用且易于获取。