Kirkham Jamie John, Bouamra Omar
Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, Shelley's Cottage, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1494-501. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815ebabf.
In recent years, performance monitoring has gained increasing attention as a tool for evaluating the delivery of health care services and is a topic of increasing importance in trauma systems. The main objective of this article is to illustrate a proactive method for assessing the performance of trauma centers in England and Wales, while taking into account common causes of variation. The aim is to present a methodology that is easily interpretable and avoids the spurious ranking of hospitals which can often lead to the misinterpretation on what is perceived to be the best and worst performing hospital, as measured by a prespecified performance indicator.
The Ws statistic was introduced over 10 years ago to quantify the performance of trauma care systems through definitive outcome based evaluation (DEF) methods. Little advancement on this methodology has been made since its introduction. In this article, we highlight some of the limitations and problems associated with these DEF methods and introduce the funnel plot, a form of control chart to monitor hospital performance.
The number of patients included in a Ws statistical analysis can seriously change the ranking of a hospital. These complex issues with ranking means that league tables (or standings charts), which form part of the DEF method are an unsatisfactory method to represent performance indicators. The funnel plot methodology is an alternative graphical method for monitoring hospital performance, which has no emphasis on ranking. We demonstrate the method using mortality data and length of stay as the performance indicators.
The funnel plot is a flexible, attractively simple method for comparing hospital performance and avoids spurious ranking of hospitals in league tables. The method can be applied to any number of performance indicators and can help formulate hypotheses about individual hospital characteristics likely to improve performance.
近年来,绩效监测作为评估医疗服务提供情况的一种工具,受到了越来越多的关注,并且在创伤系统中是一个日益重要的话题。本文的主要目的是阐述一种积极主动的方法,用于评估英格兰和威尔士创伤中心的绩效,同时考虑到变异的常见原因。目的是提出一种易于解释的方法,并避免对医院进行虚假排名,而这种虚假排名往往会导致对按预先指定的绩效指标衡量的最佳和最差表现医院的误解。
十多年前引入了Ws统计量,以通过基于确定性结果的评估(DEF)方法来量化创伤护理系统的绩效。自引入以来,这种方法几乎没有什么进展。在本文中,我们强调了与这些DEF方法相关的一些局限性和问题,并引入了漏斗图,这是一种用于监测医院绩效的控制图形式。
纳入Ws统计分析的患者数量会严重改变医院的排名。排名中存在的这些复杂问题意味着,作为DEF方法一部分的排行榜(或排名表)是一种不能令人满意的表示绩效指标的方法。漏斗图方法是一种用于监测医院绩效的替代图形方法,它不强调排名。我们使用死亡率数据和住院时间作为绩效指标来演示该方法。
漏斗图是一种灵活、简单且有吸引力的比较医院绩效的方法,可避免在排行榜中对医院进行虚假排名。该方法可应用于任何数量的绩效指标,并有助于就可能改善绩效的各个医院特征提出假设。