• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衰老、进化能力与个体获益需求;衰老理论争议的医学启示

Aging, evolvability, and the individual benefit requirement; medical implications of aging theory controversies.

作者信息

Goldsmith Theodore C

机构信息

Azinet LLC, 553 Osprey Point Road, Crownsville, MD 21032, USA.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2008 Jun 21;252(4):764-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.035. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.035
PMID:18396295
Abstract

There is a class of theories of aging (variously termed adaptive aging, aging by design, aging selected for its own sake, or programmed death theories) that hold that an organism design that limits life span conveys benefits and was selected specifically because it limits life span. These theories have enjoyed a resurgence of popularity because of the discovery of genes that promote aging in various organisms. However, traditional evolution theory has a core tenet that excludes the possibility of evolving and retaining an individually adverse organism design, i.e. a design characteristic that reduces the ability of individual organisms to survive or reproduce without any compensating individual benefit. Various theories of aging dating from the 1950s and based on traditional evolution theory enjoy substantial popularity. Therefore, any theorist proposing an adaptive theory of aging must necessarily also propose some adjustment to traditional evolution theory that specifically addresses the individual benefit issue. This paper describes an adaptive theory of aging and describes how one of the proposed adjustments (evolvability theory) supports adaptive aging. This issue is important because adaptive theories are generally more optimistic regarding prospects for medical intervention in the aging process and also suggest different approaches in achieving such intervention.

摘要

有一类衰老理论(有多种称呼,如适应性衰老、设计性衰老、因自身缘故而选择的衰老或程序性死亡理论)认为,一种限制寿命的生物体设计会带来益处,并且正是因为它限制了寿命才被特意选择。由于在各种生物体中发现了促进衰老的基因,这些理论再度受到欢迎。然而,传统进化理论有一个核心原则,即排除了进化并保留对个体不利的生物体设计的可能性,也就是说,一种设计特征如果会降低个体生物体在没有任何补偿性个体益处的情况下生存或繁殖的能力。自20世纪50年代以来基于传统进化理论的各种衰老理论广受欢迎。因此,任何提出适应性衰老理论的理论家都必须同时提出对传统进化理论的某种调整,专门解决个体益处问题。本文描述了一种适应性衰老理论,并阐述了所提出的调整之一(可进化性理论)如何支持适应性衰老。这个问题很重要,因为适应性理论通常对衰老过程中医疗干预的前景更为乐观,并且还提出了实现这种干预的不同方法。

相似文献

1
Aging, evolvability, and the individual benefit requirement; medical implications of aging theory controversies.衰老、进化能力与个体获益需求;衰老理论争议的医学启示
J Theor Biol. 2008 Jun 21;252(4):764-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.035. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
2
Aging as an evolved characteristic - Weismann's theory reconsidered.衰老作为一种进化特征——对魏斯曼理论的重新审视。
Med Hypotheses. 2004;62(2):304-8. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00337-2.
3
Digital Genetics, Variation, Evolvability, and the Evolution of Programmed Aging.数字遗传学、变异、可进化性与程序性衰老的演化。
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2019 Dec;84(12):1451-1457. doi: 10.1134/S0006297919120046.
4
The evolution of late life.晚年的演变。
Ageing Res Rev. 2006 Feb;5(1):14-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2005.06.003. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
5
Evolvability, Population Benefit, and the Evolution of Programmed Aging in Mammals.哺乳动物的可进化性、种群益处与程序性衰老的进化
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2017 Dec;82(12):1423-1429. doi: 10.1134/S0006297917120021.
6
The myth and reality of reversal of aging by hormesis.应激效应逆转衰老的神话与现实。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1057:165-76. doi: 10.1196/annals.1356.010.
7
The evolutionary theories of aging revisited--a mini-review.重探衰老的进化理论——一篇综述短文
Gerontology. 2009;55(2):205-16. doi: 10.1159/000200772. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
8
Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens.微生物病原体中性别(交配型)的适应值。
Infect Genet Evol. 2008 May;8(3):267-85. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
9
Adaptive aging in the context of evolutionary theory.适应衰老的进化理论观。
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2012 Jul;77(7):716-25. doi: 10.1134/S0006297912070036.
10
The ecological stress theory of aging and hormesis: an energetic evolutionary model.衰老与兴奋效应的生态应激理论:一种能量进化模型。
Biogerontology. 2007 Jun;8(3):233-42. doi: 10.1007/s10522-007-9080-z. Epub 2007 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolvable Soma Theory of Ageing: insights from computer simulations.衰老的可进化体细胞理论:来自计算机模拟的见解
Biogerontology. 2025 Apr 4;26(2):87. doi: 10.1007/s10522-025-10224-z.
2
Beneficial death: A substantial element of evolution?有益的死亡:进化的一个重要因素?
Biogerontology. 2025 Jan 18;26(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s10522-024-10176-w.
3
Directional selection coupled with kin selection favors the establishment of senescence.定向选择和亲属选择有利于衰老的建立。
BMC Biol. 2023 Oct 23;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01716-w.
4
Is Aging an Inevitable Characteristic of Organic Life or an Evolutionary Adaptation?衰老是否是有机生命的必然特征还是一种进化适应?
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2022 Dec;87(12):1413-1445. doi: 10.1134/S0006297922120021.
5
Epidemics as an adaptive driving force determining lifespan setpoints.作为适应性驱动力量的传染病决定寿命基准点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17937-17948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920988117. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
6
Perspectives of lifespan extension: focus on external or internal resources?寿命延长的视角:关注外部还是内部资源?
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Mar 27;12(6):5566-5584. doi: 10.18632/aging.102981.
7
Ageing Throughout History: The Evolution of Human Lifespan.历史上的老龄化:人类寿命的演变。
J Mol Evol. 2020 Jan;88(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s00239-019-09896-2. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
8
Does senescence promote fitness in Caenorhabditis elegans by causing death?衰老是否通过引起死亡来促进秀丽隐杆线虫的适应性?
Ageing Res Rev. 2019 Mar;50:58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
9
Theory and associated phenomenology for intrinsic mortality arising from natural selection.自然选择导致的内在死亡率的理论及相关现象学。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29;12(3):e0173677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173677. eCollection 2017.
10
Empirical Validation of a Hypothesis of the Hormetic Selective Forces Driving the Evolution of Longevity Regulation Mechanisms.关于驱动长寿调节机制进化的应激性选择力假说的实证验证。
Front Genet. 2016 Dec 6;7:216. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00216. eCollection 2016.