• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性下腰痛的疼痛强度测量

Pain intensity measurement in chronic low back pain.

作者信息

Strong J, Ashton R, Chant D

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Social Sciences Group, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 1991 Sep;7(3):209-18. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199109000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00002508-199109000-00007
PMID:1839716
Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of eight pain intensity measures used with chronic low back pain patients. All measures were similar in terms of scale distribution and rates of incorrect responses, with all scales apart from the Pain Rating Index significantly correlated. Principal axis factoring of data from 92 patients indicated the presence of one general factor on which all pain intensity measures except the Pain Rating Index loaded. The 101-point Numeric Rating Scale and the Box Scale had the strongest relationship, with loadings of 0.90. The Numeric Rating Scale and the Box Scale appear to be the scales of choice for the measurement of pain intensity in the low back pain patient.

摘要

本研究调查了用于慢性下腰痛患者的八项疼痛强度测量指标的心理测量特性。所有测量指标在量表分布和错误反应率方面相似,除疼痛评定指数外,所有量表均显著相关。对92名患者的数据进行主成分因子分析表明,存在一个一般因子,除疼痛评定指数外,所有疼痛强度测量指标均负荷于此因子。101点数字评定量表和方格量表的关系最为密切,负荷量为0.90。数字评定量表和方格量表似乎是测量下腰痛患者疼痛强度的首选量表。

相似文献

1
Pain intensity measurement in chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛的疼痛强度测量
Clin J Pain. 1991 Sep;7(3):209-18. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199109000-00007.
2
Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.术后疼痛强度评估:中国成年人四种量表的比较
Pain Med. 2007 Apr;8(3):223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x.
3
Estimating EQ-5D values from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.根据奥斯威斯利残疾指数以及背部和腿部疼痛数字评定量表估算EQ-5D值。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):678-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000220.
4
Determining Predictive Outcome Factors for a Multimodal Treatment Program in Low Back Pain Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.确定腰痛患者多模式治疗方案的预测结果因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Nov-Dec;40(9):659-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.09.001.
5
Differentiation between somatic and cognitive/affective components in commonly used measurements of depression in patients with chronic low-back pain. Let's not mix apples and oranges.慢性下腰痛患者常用抑郁症测量中躯体与认知/情感成分的区分。咱们别把不同的事物混为一谈。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6 Suppl):S213-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00007.
6
Do numerical rating scales and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire capture changes that are meaningful to patients with persistent back pain?数字评分量表和 Roland-Morris 残疾问卷能否捕捉到持续性背痛患者有意义的变化?
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jul;24(7):648-57. doi: 10.1177/0269215510367975. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
7
Performance of the Angle Labor Pain Questionnaire During Initiation of Epidural Analgesia in Early Active Labor.活跃期早期硬膜外镇痛开始时角度分娩疼痛问卷的性能
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1546-1553. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001679.
8
The effect of Therapeutic Touch on Back Pain in Adults on a Neurological Unit: An Experimental Pilot Study.治疗性触摸对神经科病房成年患者背痛的影响:一项实验性初步研究。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Feb;20(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
9
The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain.用于测量骨关节炎膝关节疼痛的阿拉伯数字疼痛评定量表的心理测量学特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(24):2392-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1129441. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
Pain assessment in younger and older pain patients: psychometric properties and patient preference of five commonly used measures of pain intensity.年轻和老年疼痛患者的疼痛评估:五种常用疼痛强度测量方法的心理测量特性及患者偏好
Pain Med. 2007 Oct-Nov;8(7):601-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00311.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Boot Camp treatment program for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in Danish chiropractic care-a feasibility study.丹麦整脊治疗中腰椎管狭窄症患者的新兵训练营治疗方案——一项可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 30;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01687-5.
2
Criteria for determining if a treatment for pain works.确定一种疼痛治疗方法是否有效的标准。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Aug 15;1(Suppl 2):100125. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100125. eCollection 2022.
3
Athrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for the relief of neck pain and cervicogenic headache.
lateral atlanto-axial joint 寰枢外侧关节 cervicogenic headache 颈源性头痛
Pain Med. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):203-210. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad153.
4
Embedded emergency department physical therapy versus usual care for acute low back pain: a protocol for the NEED-PT randomised trial.嵌入式急诊部物理治疗与常规护理治疗急性腰痛的比较:一项 NEED-PT 随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e061283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061283.
5
Factors Associated With Clinical Responses to Spinal Manipulation in Patients With Non-specific Thoracic Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.非特异性胸背痛患者脊柱手法治疗临床反应的相关因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 6;2:742119. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.742119. eCollection 2021.
6
Observing treatment outcomes in other patients can elicit augmented placebo effects on pain treatment: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial with patients with chronic low back pain.观察其他患者的治疗效果可以增强对疼痛治疗的安慰剂效应:一项针对慢性腰痛患者的双盲随机临床试验。
Pain. 2022 Jul 1;163(7):1313-1323. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002513. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
7
Adherence and characteristics of participants enrolled in a standardised programme of patient education and exercises for low back pain, GLA:D® Back - a prospective observational study.参与 GLA:D® Back(一种标准化的腰痛患者教育和锻炼计划)的患者的依从性和特点 - 一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 May 22;22(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04329-y.
8
Long-term improvements following a residential combined physical and psychological programme for chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛的住院综合身体和心理治疗后的长期改善。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 May;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001068.
9
The patient enablement instrument for back pain: reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness.腰痛患者赋权量表:信度、内容效度、结构效度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 9;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01758-0.
10
Examining Health Care Mobility of Transgender Veterans Across the Veterans Health Administration.审视退伍军人健康管理局中跨性别退伍军人的医疗保健流动性。
LGBT Health. 2021 Feb-Mar;8(2):143-151. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0152. Epub 2021 Jan 28.