• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Client perception of therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy and growth groups: an empirically-based hierarchical model.

作者信息

Dierick Paul, Lietaer Germain

机构信息

Psychiatric Center Sint-Norbertushuis at Duffel, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Group Psychother. 2008 Apr;58(2):203-30. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.2.203.

DOI:10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.2.203
PMID:18399739
Abstract

To assess group participants' perceptions of therapeutic factors, we developed an extensive questionnaire of 155 items that was administered to 489 members of 78 psychotherapy and growth groups of client-centered/experiential, psychoanalytic, behavioral, Gestalt and drama- and bodily oriented orientations. Using multivariate analyses we found a model that reveals the structure and connections of therapeutic factors as they are differentiated in the experience of the group members. Our model encompasses three hierarchical levels of abstraction: 28 Basic scales that appeared to be structured into seven main scales (Group Cohesion, Interactional Confirmation, Cathartic Self-Revelation, Self-Insight and Progress, Observational Experiences, Getting Directives, and Interactional Confrontation) and two dimensions (Relational Climate and Psychological Work). Validity for these therapeutic factors was found in their grounded content, statistically analyzed constructs, importance ratings, and correlations to intermediate outcome measures.

摘要

相似文献

1
Client perception of therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy and growth groups: an empirically-based hierarchical model.
Int J Group Psychother. 2008 Apr;58(2):203-30. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.2.203.
2
[Motivation for psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic treatment of vocational stresses -- development and validation of a questionnaire].[职业压力的心身-心理治疗动机——一份问卷的编制与验证]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Feb;44(1):14-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-834599.
3
[Therapeutic factors in psychoanalytic-interactional and depth psychology founded group therapy: an empirical study].
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1992 Mar-Apr;42(3-4):102-9.
4
Analyzing differences between psychotherapy groups and social support groups for breast cancer patients: development of an assessment method using video recordings.分析乳腺癌患者心理治疗小组和社会支持小组之间的差异:使用视频记录开发评估方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Mar;82(3):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.11.018. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
5
[SEB--an instrument for the assessment of therapeutic processes in inpatient psychotherapy].[SEB——一种用于评估住院心理治疗中治疗过程的工具]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1999 Dec;49(12):476-83.
6
Therapeutic alliance and cohesion variables as predictors of outcome in short-term group psychotherapy.治疗联盟与凝聚力变量作为短期团体心理治疗结果的预测因素
Int J Group Psychother. 2007 Jul;57(3):269-96. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2007.57.3.269.
7
[Validation study of the Depressive Experience Questionnaire].《抑郁体验问卷的效度研究》
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):445-55.
8
Self-reported defence mechanisms as an outcome measure in psychotherapy: a study on the German version of the Defence Style Questionnaire DSQ 40.作为心理治疗结果指标的自我报告防御机制:一项关于德文版防御方式问卷DSQ 40的研究
Psychol Psychother. 2007 Sep;80(Pt 3):355-66. doi: 10.1348/147608306X146068.
9
The assessment of the analytic group treatment efficiency according to Yalom's classification.根据亚隆分类法对分析性团体治疗效果进行评估。
Coll Antropol. 2001 Jun;25(1):227-37.
10
[Utility of the questionnaire for quality of life EORTC-QLQ-C30 in psycho-oncological outcome research].[欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷EORTC-QLQ-C30在心理肿瘤学结局研究中的效用]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Jan;129(1):14-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-44873.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Factors and Member Satisfaction in an Online Group Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间在线团体干预中的治疗因素与成员满意度
J Technol Behav Sci. 2021;6(4):609-619. doi: 10.1007/s41347-021-00216-4. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
2
Exploration of experiences in therapeutic groups for patients with severe mental illness: development of the Ferrara group experiences scale (FE- GES).探讨重症精神病患者治疗小组的经验:费拉拉小组经验量表(FE-GES)的开发。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 1;13:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-242.