Suppr超能文献

前列腺体积增大对开放式及机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治性切除术的影响。

Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Chan Robert C, Barocas Daniel A, Chang Sam S, Herrell S Duke, Clark Peter E, Baumgartner Roxy, Smith Joseph A, Cookson Michael S

机构信息

Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2765, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2008 May;101(9):1140-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07428.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes based on gland size between robotically assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) and open RP (RRP), as larger prostates might increase the difficulty of RP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 660 patients who had RALP and 340 who had RRP from May 2003 to August 2006; the patients were divided into two groups, with a prostate of >75 and <or=75 g. The clinical characteristics, surgical approach, perioperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with large prostates were significantly older (P < 0.001), but had a lower pathological stage (RALP, P = 0.046, and RRP, P = 0.008) than patients with small glands, regardless of technique. There was no difference in length of stay or transfusion rates between the groups. A large prostate increased the operative duration of RALP (P < 0.001) but not of RRP. For both RALP and RRP, positive margin rates were lower with larger glands (RALP, P = 0.014; RRP, P = 0.033). Overall, the positive margin rates were lower with RALP (9.9% and 19.0%) than RRP (18.5% and 35.5%) among patients with larger or smaller (P < 0.001) glands, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostates of >or=75 g had fewer positive margins than smaller glands, regardless of surgical technique. There was also a significant decrease in positive margin rate in among prostates of >75 g in favour of RALP. Thus, RALP appears to be comparable with RRP for patients with large glands, and might reduce the positive margin rate.

摘要

目的

鉴于较大的前列腺可能会增加根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的难度,评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)与开放性RP(RRP)在基于腺体大小的手术结果。

患者与方法

我们回顾了2003年5月至2006年8月期间接受RALP的660例患者和接受RRP的340例患者;将患者分为两组,前列腺重量>75 g和≤75 g。评估临床特征、手术方式、围手术期和术后结果。

结果

无论采用何种技术,大前列腺患者的年龄显著更大(P<0.001),但病理分期低于小腺体患者(RALP,P = 0.046;RRP,P = 0.008)。两组之间的住院时间或输血率没有差异。大前列腺增加了RALP的手术时间(P<0.001),但未增加RRP的手术时间。对于RALP和RRP,腺体越大,切缘阳性率越低(RALP,P = 0.014;RRP,P = 0.033)。总体而言,大腺体或小腺体患者中,RALP的切缘阳性率(分别为9.9%和19.0%)低于RRP(分别为18.5%和35.5%)(P<0.001)。

结论

无论手术技术如何,前列腺重量≥75 g的患者切缘阳性情况少于较小腺体的患者。在前列腺重量>75 g的患者中,RALP的切缘阳性率也显著降低。因此,对于大腺体患者,RALP似乎与RRP相当,并且可能降低切缘阳性率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验