• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射技师对乳房X光片进行额外双人读片的引入:对两年一次筛查计划结果的影响

Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.

作者信息

Duijm Lucien E M, Groenewoud Johanna H, Fracheboud Jacques, van Ineveld B Martin, Roumen Rudi M H, de Koning Harry J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jun;44(9):1223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.03.003
PMID:18400488
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of introducing radiographer double reading, in addition to standard radiologist double reading, on screening mammography outcome.

METHODS

In period A, 66,225 mammograms were read by two screening radiologists. In period B, 78,325 mammograms were read by two radiographers in addition and radiologists were blinded to the referral opinion of the radiographers. Mammograms, for which only radiographers had suggested referral, (i.e. cases that would only be referred by technologists) were re-evaluated by the screening radiologists. Women were referred if at least one radiologist considered this necessary, and diagnostic costs of these additional referrals were estimated.

RESULTS

In period A, 322 cancers were diagnosed after referral of 678 women. During period B, radiologists initially referred 1122 patients and 411 cancers were detected. Radiologists' referral rate was higher in period B than in period A (1.43% versus 1.02%, p<0.001), as well as the cancer detection rate per 1000 women screened (CDR) (5.25 versus 4.86, p=0.3). The positive predictive value of referral (PPV) was 36.6% versus 47.5% (p<0.001). In period B, radiologist review of 544 additional positive radiographer readings led to 102 extra referrals, with 29 additional cancers detected, resulting in an overall referral rate of 1.56% (compared to period A, p<0.001), an overall CDR of 5.62 (p=0.048) and an overall PPV of 35.9% (p<0.001). Workup expenses of the 102 additional referrals were euro60,274.

CONCLUSION

Additional radiographer double reading detected cancers that would have been missed by radiologists. Mean expenses for diagnostic confirmation of these extra cancers was euro2078 per cancer.

摘要

目的

确定除标准的放射科医生双人阅片外,引入放射技师双人阅片对乳腺筛查结果的影响。

方法

在A阶段,由两名乳腺筛查放射科医生阅读66225份乳房X光片。在B阶段,另外由两名放射技师阅读78325份乳房X光片,且放射科医生对放射技师的转诊意见不知情。对于只有放射技师建议转诊的乳房X光片(即只有技术人员会转诊的病例),由筛查放射科医生重新评估。如果至少有一名放射科医生认为有必要,女性患者会被转诊,并估算这些额外转诊的诊断费用。

结果

在A阶段,678名女性被转诊后诊断出322例癌症。在B阶段,放射科医生最初转诊了1122名患者,检测出411例癌症。B阶段放射科医生的转诊率高于A阶段(1.43%对1.02%,p<0.001),每1000名接受筛查女性的癌症检出率(CDR)也是如此(5.25对4.86,p=0.3)。转诊的阳性预测值(PPV)为36.6%对47.5%(p<0.001)。在B阶段,放射科医生对放射技师另外544份阳性阅片进行复查,导致额外转诊102例,又检测出29例癌症,总体转诊率为1.56%(与A阶段相比,p<0.001),总体CDR为5.62(p=0.048),总体PPV为35.9%(p<0.001)。额外102例转诊的检查费用为60274欧元。

结论

放射技师额外的双人阅片检测出了放射科医生会漏诊的癌症。这些额外癌症的诊断确认平均费用为每例癌症2078欧元。

相似文献

1
Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.放射技师对乳房X光片进行额外双人读片的引入:对两年一次筛查计划结果的影响
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jun;44(9):1223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
2
Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.放射技师对乳腺筛查钼靶进行额外的双人读片:对筛查性能参数的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1162-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm050. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
3
Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.数字乳腺筛查中,盲法双读比非盲法双读具有更高的方案敏感性:荷兰南部一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):391-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome.乳腺钼靶筛查中的观察者间变异性以及阅片者类型和数量对筛查结果的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Mar 24;100(6):901-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604954. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
5
Cost-effectiveness of different reading and referral strategies in mammography screening in the Netherlands.荷兰乳腺钼靶筛查中不同阅片及转诊策略的成本效益
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Apr;102(2):211-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9319-4. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
6
Performance of Radiologists and Radiographers in Double Reading Mammograms: The UK National Health Service Breast Screening Program.放射科医生和放射技师在双重读取乳腺 X 光片中的表现:英国国家医疗服务体系乳腺筛查计划。
Radiology. 2023 Jan;306(1):102-109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212951. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms.乳腺钼靶筛查:乳腺钼靶片双读与单读的增量成本效益分析
BMJ. 1996 Mar 30;312(7034):809-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7034.809.
8
Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening.放射技师/放射科医生双人读片与单人读片在乳腺癌筛查中的比较。
J Med Screen. 1996;3(1):18-22. doi: 10.1177/096914139600300106.
9
Additional Breast Cancer Detection at Digital Screening Mammography through Quality Assurance Sessions between Technologists and Radiologists.通过技师和放射科医生之间的质量保证会议提高数字筛查乳房 X 光检查中的乳腺癌检出率。
Radiology. 2020 Mar;294(3):509-517. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191388. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Double versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme: a cost-consequence analysis.乳腺癌筛查项目中乳腺钼靶片的双人阅片与单人阅片:成本效益分析
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3262-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4175-4. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Efficacy of Five Different Imaging Modalities in the Assessment of Women Recalled at Breast Screening-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.五种不同成像方式在乳腺筛查召回女性评估中的诊断效能——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3505. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203505.
2
DeepCAT: Deep Computer-Aided Triage of Screening Mammography.DeepCAT:用于筛查性乳房 X 光摄影的深度计算机辅助分诊。
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Feb;34(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00407-0. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
3
Characteristics of screen-detected cancers following concordant or discordant recalls at blinded double reading in biennial digital screening mammography.
在两年一次的数字乳腺筛查中,经过盲法双读的一致性或非一致性召回后,屏幕检测到的癌症的特征。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5586-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone.乳腺摄影中的错误不能仅通过技术来解决。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):291-301. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.291.
5
Evaluating radiographers' diagnostic accuracy in screen-reading mammograms: what constitutes a quality study?评估放射技师在乳腺钼靶筛查读片中的诊断准确性:什么样的研究才是高质量研究?
J Med Radiat Sci. 2015 Mar;62(1):23-31. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.68. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
6
Evaluation of radiographers' mammography screen-reading accuracy in Australia.澳大利亚放射技师乳腺X线摄影阅片准确性评估。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2015 Mar;62(1):15-22. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.59. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
7
Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.将乳腺放射技师的报告用作放射科医生对数字化乳腺摄影中微钙化解读的第二种意见。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Mar;88(1047):20140565. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140565. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.乳腺摄影技师对社区实践中放射科医生解读乳腺筛查X光片能力的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):278-89. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
9
Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study.乳腺筛查钼靶片非盲法双读时筛查放射科医生对之间筛查结果的差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Radiol. 2014 May;24(5):1097-104. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3102-4. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
10
Benefits of the quality assured double and arbitration reading of mammograms in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in symptomatic women.在症状性妇女乳腺癌的早期诊断中,质量保证的双读和仲裁读乳腺 X 光片的益处。
Eur Radiol. 2012 May;22(5):1014-22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2334-9. Epub 2011 Nov 18.