Suppr超能文献

复合树脂和汞合金修复体的长期劣化。

Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.

作者信息

Smales R J

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 1991 Nov-Dec;16(6):202-9.

PMID:1840079
Abstract

Previous long-term longitudinal studies of two different methods of placing an auto-cured conventional anterior composite resin, and of a low- and a high-copper amalgam alloy, had shown similar restoration survivals despite the different resin treatment methods used or the types of amalgam alloy placed. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess several clinical factors or characteristics of these restorations that were believed to affect the survival of the restorative materials. The 950 composite resin and the 1042 amalgam restorations examined were placed by many operators in numerous patients attending a dental hospital. The composite resin restorations were placed using unetched- and etched-enamel-bonding treatment methods, and the amalgam restorations were polished after insertion. Clinical ratings supplemented by color transparencies were used for the assessment of four factors for the resin, and four factors for the amalgam restoration. Significant deterioration differences were found for several of the clinical factors assessed for both the two different composite resin treatment methods, and for the two different amalgam alloys, which were not directly related to the restoration survivals.

摘要

此前针对两种不同的自凝常规前牙复合树脂放置方法以及一种低铜和一种高铜汞合金进行的长期纵向研究表明,尽管使用了不同的树脂处理方法或放置了不同类型的汞合金,但修复体的存留率相似。因此,本研究的目的是评估这些修复体的几个临床因素或特征,这些因素或特征被认为会影响修复材料的存留率。接受检查的950个复合树脂修复体和1042个汞合金修复体由多名操作人员为众多到牙科医院就诊的患者进行放置。复合树脂修复体采用未酸蚀和酸蚀牙釉质粘结处理方法进行放置,汞合金修复体在充填后进行抛光。通过彩色透明片辅助的临床评级用于评估树脂修复体的四个因素以及汞合金修复体的四个因素。对于两种不同的复合树脂处理方法以及两种不同的汞合金所评估的几个临床因素,发现了显著的恶化差异,这些差异与修复体的存留率并无直接关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验