Breckenridge W H, Ayles Victoria L, Wright Timothy G
Room 2020, Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
J Phys Chem A. 2008 May 8;112(18):4209-14. doi: 10.1021/jp711886a. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
Evidence is presented that there is a clear covalent component in the bonding of Au+ to Kr and Au+ to Xe, with some evidence that there may be such bonding between Au+ and Ar; for Au+ and Ne, there is no such evidence, and the bonding seems to be entirely physical. A model potential analysis shows that when all attractive inductive and dispersive terms out to R-8 are properly included in the Au+-Ne case, with an Ae(-bR) Born-Mayer repulsive term, essentially all the bonding in Au+-Ne can be rationalized by physical attraction alone. This is consistent with a natural bond order (NBO) analysis of the Au+-Ne ab initio wavefunctions, which shows the charge on Au+ to be very close to 1.0. In contrast, similar model potential and NBO analyses show quite clearly that physical interactions alone cannot account for the large bond energy values for the Au+-Kr and Au+-Xe complexes and are consistent with covalent contributions to the Au+-Kr and Au+-Xe interactions. Au+-Ar is seen to lie on the borderline between these two limits. In performing the model potential analyses, high-level ab initio calculations are employed [CCSD(T) energies, extrapolated to the complete basis set limit], to obtain reliable values of Re, De and omegae as input. A comparison of the gold-Xe bond distances in several solid-state Au(I, II and III) oxidation-state complex ions, containing "ligand" Xe atoms, prepared by Seppelt and co-workers, with that of the "free" Au+-Xe gas-phase ion is made, and a discussion of the trends is presented.
有证据表明,Au⁺与Kr以及Au⁺与Xe的键合中存在明显的共价成分,有一些证据表明Au⁺与Ar之间可能存在这种键合;对于Au⁺与Ne,不存在这样的证据,其键合似乎完全是物理性的。模型势分析表明,在Au⁺-Ne的情况下,当将所有直至R⁻⁸的吸引性诱导和色散项都适当地包含在内,并加上一个Ae⁻ᵇᴿ形式的玻恩-迈耶排斥项时,基本上Au⁺-Ne中的所有键合仅通过物理吸引力就可以得到合理的解释。这与对Au⁺-Ne从头算波函数的自然键序(NBO)分析一致,该分析表明Au⁺上的电荷非常接近1.0。相比之下,类似的模型势和NBO分析清楚地表明,仅物理相互作用无法解释Au⁺-Kr和Au⁺-Xe配合物的大键能值,并且与Au⁺-Kr和Au⁺-Xe相互作用中的共价贡献一致。可以看出Au⁺-Ar处于这两个极限之间的边界线上。在进行模型势分析时,采用了高水平的从头算计算[CCSD(T)能量,外推到完整基组极限],以获得可靠的Re、De和ωe值作为输入。将Seppelt及其同事制备的几种含有“配体”Xe原子的固态Au(I、II和III)氧化态复合离子中的金-氙键距离与“自由”Au⁺-Xe气相离子的键距离进行了比较,并对这些趋势进行了讨论。