Suppr超能文献

院外突发意外死亡初始死亡证明诊断中的差异:心血管尸检的作用

Discrepancies in initial death certificate diagnoses in sudden unexpected out-of-hospital deaths: the role of cardiovascular autopsy.

作者信息

Tavora Fabio, Crowder Clinton, Kutys Robert, Burke Allen

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Maryland, 22 South Greene Street, Room NBW43, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Pathol. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of death certificates issued for out-of-hospital sudden deaths has been questioned.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a series of consecutive autopsies performed at two community hospitals.

RESULTS

Fifty-four autopsies in which the deaths were sudden and that occurred outside the hospital were retained for study. The indication for autopsy was largely driven by the wishes of family or physician who was uncertain about the diagnosis. The overall discrepancy rate was 52%. The death certificate diagnosis, rendered before autopsy, was coronary artery disease in 44/54 autopsies (81%). At autopsy, coronary artery disease was the cause of death in 26 cases (48%), cardiomyopathy in 10 (18%), ruptured aneurysm in 8 (15%), pulmonary embolism in 7 (13%), and valve disease in 3 (6%). The diagnosis of coronary artery disease on the death certificate was accurate only 50% of the time. The discrepancy rate was lowest in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (33%) and was 60% in patients with no prior medical history. The accuracy rate of death certificates was under one third in cases of cardiomyopathy, valve disease, ruptured aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, and valve disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in a highly selected group of sudden deaths, in which there was often a question about cause of death, the rate of initial death certificate accuracy is only one half. Furthermore, coronary artery disease as the cause of death is less than 50%, far less than initial death certificate diagnoses would indicate.

摘要

背景

院外猝死所开具死亡证明的准确性受到质疑。

方法

我们回顾性研究了在两家社区医院进行的一系列连续尸检。

结果

保留了54例猝死且发生在院外的尸检用于研究。尸检的指征很大程度上由对诊断存疑的家属或医生的意愿驱动。总体差异率为52%。尸检前开具的死亡证明诊断中,54例尸检中有44例(81%)为冠状动脉疾病。尸检时,冠状动脉疾病是26例(48%)的死因,心肌病为10例(18%),动脉瘤破裂为8例(15%),肺栓塞为7例(13%),瓣膜病为3例(6%)。死亡证明上冠状动脉疾病的诊断仅有50%的时间是准确的。有心血管疾病史患者的差异率最低(33%),无既往病史患者的差异率为60%。在心肌病、瓣膜病、动脉瘤破裂、肺栓塞和瓣膜病病例中,死亡证明的准确率不到三分之一。

结论

我们得出结论,在一组经过高度筛选的猝死病例中,这些病例中死因往往存在疑问,初始死亡证明的准确率仅为一半。此外,冠状动脉疾病作为死因的比例不到50%,远低于初始死亡证明诊断所显示的比例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验