Ruessmann Heinz-Jürgen
AND, Wilhelminenstr. 22, 46537 Dinslaken, Germany.
J Diabetes Complications. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):174-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
In this retrospective real-world study, we aimed to evaluate whether switching from the pathogenetic treatment option alpha-lipoic acid to drugs for symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain such as gabapentin would be associated with changes in efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. A cohort of 443 diabetic patients with chronic painful neuropathy were treated with alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg qd orally for a mean period of 5 years. After stopping this treatment, 293 patients were switched to gabapentin (600-2400 mg/day), while 150 patients remained untreated because of no acute symptoms. In the untreated group, 110 (73%) patients developed neuropathic symptoms as soon as 2 weeks after the end of treatment with alpha-lipoic acid. In the group started on gabapentin, 131 (45%) patients had to stop taking the drug due to intolerable side effects. Among the patients treated with gabapentin 132 (45%) were responders on an average dose of 1200 mg/day, whereas 161 (55%) were nonresponders at gabapentin doses up to 2400 mg/day. These patients required an alternative treatment which consisted of pregabalin, carbamazepine, amitriptyline, tramadol, or morphine as monotherapy or in combination. The daily costs for alpha-lipoic acid were considerably lower than those for gabapentin or several frequently used drug combinations. The frequency of outpatient visits was 3.8 times per 3 months during the treatment period with alpha-lipoic acid, while it increased to 7.9 per 3 months after switching to gabapentin or the other pain medications. In conclusion, switching from long-term treatment with alpha-lipoic acid to central analgesic drugs such as gabapentin in painful diabetic neuropathy was associated with considerably higher rates of side effects, frequencies of outpatient visits, and daily costs of treatment. The pathogenic treatment option represents for the practicing diabetologist an effective, safe, and cost-effective treatment option for the majority of patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.
在这项回顾性真实世界研究中,我们旨在评估从病因性治疗药物α-硫辛酸转换为用于神经性疼痛症状性治疗的药物(如加巴喷丁)是否会与疗效、安全性和成本效益的变化相关。一组443例患有慢性疼痛性神经病变的糖尿病患者口服α-硫辛酸600毫克,每日一次,平均治疗5年。停止该治疗后,293例患者转换为加巴喷丁(600 - 2400毫克/天),而150例患者因无急性症状未接受治疗。在未治疗组中,110例(73%)患者在α-硫辛酸治疗结束后仅2周就出现了神经病变症状。在开始使用加巴喷丁的组中,131例(45%)患者因无法耐受的副作用而不得不停药。在接受加巴喷丁治疗的患者中,132例(45%)在平均剂量为1200毫克/天时有反应,而161例(55%)在加巴喷丁剂量高达2400毫克/天时无反应。这些患者需要替代治疗,包括普瑞巴林、卡马西平、阿米替林、曲马多或吗啡作为单一疗法或联合使用。α-硫辛酸的每日费用明显低于加巴喷丁或几种常用药物组合的费用。在使用α-硫辛酸治疗期间,门诊就诊频率为每3个月3.8次,而转换为加巴喷丁或其他止痛药物后增加到每3个月7.9次。总之,在疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中,从长期使用α-硫辛酸治疗转换为使用加巴喷丁等中枢性镇痛药与更高的副作用发生率、门诊就诊频率和每日治疗费用相关。对于执业糖尿病专家而言,病因性治疗方案是大多数糖尿病多发性神经病变患者有效、安全且具有成本效益的治疗选择。