Biegstraaten M, van Schaik I N, Aerts J M F G, Hollak C E M
Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008 Jun;31(3):337-49. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0832-y. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
Gaucher disease is a lysosomal storage disorder, which is classically divided into three types. Type I Gaucher disease is differentiated from types II and III disease by the absence of nervous system involvement. However, an increasing number of reports has emerged on neurological manifestations in patients with type I Gaucher disease. Whether a strict division in three different phenotypes is still valid has been the subject of debate. The main objective of this study was to provide scientific arguments whether a distinction between type I (non-neuronopathic) and types II and III (neuronopathic) Gaucher disease should be maintained. We investigated retrospectively a large Dutch cohort of type I Gaucher disease patients for the prevalence of neurological manifestations and provide an overview of the literature on this topic. A diagnosis of a neurological disease was made 34 times in 75 patients. Forty-five patients reported at least one neurological symptom during the median follow-up time of 11 years. The literature search revealed 86 studies in which type I Gaucher disease patients or carriers of a glucocerebrosidase mutation were described with a neurological disease or a condition which is known to be associated with neurological disease. In conclusion, the term non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease does not seem to be an appropriate characterization of type I Gaucher disease. However, the neurological signs and symptoms in type I Gaucher disease are of a totally different kind from and, in the majority of cases, of much less severity than the signs and symptoms associated with types II and III disease Therefore, type I disease should be classified as a separate phenotype.
戈谢病是一种溶酶体贮积症,传统上分为三种类型。I型戈谢病与II型和III型疾病的区别在于无神经系统受累。然而,关于I型戈谢病患者神经学表现的报道越来越多。三种不同表型的严格划分是否仍然有效一直是争论的主题。本研究的主要目的是提供科学依据,以确定是否应维持I型(非神经病变型)与II型和III型(神经病变型)戈谢病之间的区分。我们回顾性调查了一大群荷兰I型戈谢病患者的神经学表现患病率,并对该主题的文献进行了综述。75例患者中有34例被诊断患有神经系统疾病。45例患者在11年的中位随访期内报告了至少一种神经学症状。文献检索发现86项研究,其中描述了I型戈谢病患者或葡萄糖脑苷脂酶突变携带者患有神经系统疾病或已知与神经系统疾病相关的病症。总之,“非神经病变型戈谢病”这一术语似乎并不是I型戈谢病的恰当描述。然而,I型戈谢病的神经体征和症状与II型和III型疾病的体征和症状完全不同,并且在大多数情况下严重程度要低得多。因此,I型疾病应归类为一个单独的表型。